Cited by 88Mental Health Research TopicsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Real-time monitoring technology in single-case experimental design research: opportunities and challenges

Bentley, Kate H., Kleiman, Evan M., Elliott, Grace, Huffman, Jeffery C., Nock, Matthew K.·2019·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Single-case experimental design (SCED) is a rigorous method of studying behavior and behavior change. A key characteristic of SCED is repeated, systematic assessment of outcome variables, which is critical to achieving high internal validity, collecting a sufficient number of observations to conduct adequately powered statistical analyses, capturing dynamic and fine-grained changes in outcomes, and tailoring interventions at the individual level. Recent advances in real-time monitoring technology, such as digital ecological momentary assessment, passive smartphone-based behavioral tracking, and physiological assessment with wearable biosensors, are extremely well-suited to conducting these repeated, systematic measurements. Here, we discuss the rationale for incorporating real-time data collection technologies within SCED and highlight how recent studies have paired SCED with real-time monitoring. We also present original data illustrating how real-time digital monitoring can provide an idiographic and granular view of behavior (in this case, suicidal ideation). Last, we discuss the challenges of, and offer our recommendations for, using real-time monitoring technologies in SCED research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.017

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extensive nature of EMA data allows for more opportunities for single-case data analysis that may be used to examine individual symptom profiles or identify person-specific triggers.

    “The extensive nature of EMA data also allows for more opportunities for single-case data analysis that may be used to examine individual symptom profiles or identify person-specific triggers (118)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bentley, K. H., Kleiman, E. M., Elliott, G., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bentley, Kate H.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
117
Pages
87-96
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904036819
Cited by
88
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Training Program in Biological and Social Psychiatry (T32MH016259)
  • KHB
  • Griswold Suicide Prevention Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
single-case experimental design, real-time monitoring, wearable biosensors, physiological assessment, suicidal ideation, personalized interventions, idiographic research
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Single-Case Studies as Topic, Computer Systems, Humans, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review