Cited by 125Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

No effects of slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) on sleep-dependent memory consolidation in healthy elderly subjects

Open access
Eggert, Torsten, Dorn, Hans, Sauter, Cornelia, Nitsche, Michael A., Bajbouj, Malek, Danker-Hopfe, Heidi·2013·Brain stimulation

Abstract

Background Studies in young healthy volunteers provided evidence of a beneficial impact of an anodal time-varied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during early slow wave rich sleep on declarative memory but not on procedural memory.Objective/hypothesis The present study investigated whether sleep-dependent memory consolidation can also be affected by slow oscillating tDCS in a population of elderly subjects.Methods 26 subjects (69.1 years ± 7.7 years) received bi-frontal anodal stimulation (max. current density: 0.331 mA/cm(2)) during early NREM sleep in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover study. Stimulation effects on offline consolidation were tested by using a declarative and a procedural memory task. Furthermore, sleep stages were scored, EEG power was analyzed and spindle densities were assessed.Results Independently from stimulation condition, performance in both memory tasks significantly decreased overnight. Stimulation revealed no significant effect on sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Verum tDCS was accompanied by significantly more time awake and significantly less NREM stage 3 sleep during five 1-min stimulation free intervals.Conclusions The results of the present study are in line with other studies showing that offline consolidation during sleep varies with age and is less pronounced in the elderly than in young or middle-aged subjects. Contrary to an almost identical positive study in young adults, slow oscillatory tDCS applied to the elderly failed to show a beneficial effect on memory consolidation in the present study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brs.2013.05.006

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eggert, T., Dorn, H., Sauter, C., Nitsche, M. A., Bajbouj, M., & Danker-Hopfe, H.
Affiliations
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Eggert, Torsten
Venue
Brain stimulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
938-945
ISSN
  • 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-861X
OpenAlex
W2076136875
Cited by
125
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, older adults, NREM sleep, slow-wave sleep, declarative memory, procedural memory, sleep spindles, age-related memory decline, anodal stimulation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Double-Blind Method, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Sleep, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review