Cited by 70Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMotor Control and AdaptationSleep and related disorders

Sleep Optimizes Motor Skill in Older Adults

Open access
Tucker, Matthew, McKinley, Sophia, Stickgold, Robert·2011·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sleep benefits motor memory in healthy elderly adults and, if so, whether the observed sleep‐related benefits are comparable with those observed in healthy young adults. DESIGN: Repeated‐measures cross‐over design. SETTING: Boston, Massachusetts (general community) and Harvard University. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen healthy older and 15 healthy young participants. MEASUREMENTS: Motor sequence task (MST) performance was assessed at training and at the beginning and end of the retest session; polysomnographic sleep studies were recorded for the elderly participants. RESULTS: After 12 hours of daytime wakefulness, elderly participants showed a dramatic decline in MST performance on the first three retest trials, and only a nonsignificant improvement by the end of retest (the last 3 retest trials). In contrast, when the same participants trained in the morning but were retested 24 hours after training, after a day of wake plus a night of sleep, they maintained their performance at the beginning of retest and demonstrated a highly significant 17.4% improvement by the end of the retest session, essentially identical to the 17.3% improvement seen in young participants. These strikingly similar improvements occurred despite the presence of other age‐related differences, including overall slower motor speed, a lag in the appearance of sleep‐dependent improvement, and an absence of correlations between overnight improvement and sleep architecture or sleep spindle density in the elderly participants. CONCLUSION: These findings provide compelling evidence that sleep optimizes motor skill performance across the adult life span.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03324.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overnight improvements typically observed in young subjects did not occur in these elderly participants.

    “However, the overnight improvements typically observed in young subjects did not occur in these elderly participants.”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1214]

    The Results (Age Differences – 24hr Wake + Sleep; page not provided) report that elderly participants showed no significant improvement at the start of retesting, but improved by 17.4% by its end—essentially the same as the young participants’ 17.3%. The claim overlooks this delayed overnight improvement. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using a finger sequence tapping task, one study reported that elderly subjects (60-79 years) maintained their performance across 24 h including sleep, while their performance was impaired after 12 h of wakefulness, suggesting a role for sleep in optimal motor consolidation also in the elderly.

    “In contrast, using a finger sequence tapping task, one study reported that elderly subjects (60 -79 years) maintained their performance across 24 h including sleep, while their performance was impaired after 12 h of wakefulness, suggesting a role for sleep in optimal motor consolidation also in the elderly (1214).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1214]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tucker, M., McKinley, S., & Stickgold, R.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-15
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
603-609
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1513102925
Cited by
70
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH048832)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep, motor skills, motor memory, older adults, aging, motor learning, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, sleep spindles, sleep architecture, age differences, motor speed
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Sleep, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review