CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62Youth Substance Use and School AttendancePsychological Treatments and AssessmentsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Intensive (daily) behavior therapy for school refusal: a multiple baseline case series

Tolin, David F., Whiting, Sara, Maltby, Nicholas, Diefenbach, Gretchen J., Lothstein, Mary Anne, Hardcastle, Surrey, Catalano, Amy, Gray, Krista·2009·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
DOI 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.02.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.02.003

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The treatment packages are designed to be flexible enough to be adapted to a variety of cases and locations, and indeed have been across educational, mental health, and medical settings.

    “The treatment packages are also designed to be flexible enough to be adapted to a variety of cases and locations, and indeed have been across educational, mental health, and medical settings (e.g., Tolin et al., 2009; Rohrig and Puliafico, 2018; Hannan et al., 2019; Thastum et al., 2019).”

    From Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absenteeism: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation, and Future Adaptability (Part 1) (2019) · cites this paper as Tolin et al., 2009

  • Limited parent-youth agreement has been reported for the SRAS and SRAS-R.

    “Limited parent-youth agreement has been reported for the SRAS (Higa, Daleiden, & Chorpita, 2002) and SRAS-R (Tolin et al., 2009).”

    From Differentiation between school attendance problems: why and how? (2019) · cites this paper as Tolin et al., 2009

  • It is not uncommon for youth to have high scores on multiple SRAS functional conditions.

    “It is not uncommon for youth to have high scores on multiple SRAS functional conditions, as evidenced in case studies (e.g., Kearney, 2002a;Kearney, Pursell, & Alvarez, 2001;Tolin et al., 2009) and studies based on larger samples (Dube & Orpinas, 2009;Kearney & Albano, 2004).”

    From Differentiation between school attendance problems: why and how? (2019) · cites this paper as Tolin et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Tolin, D. F., Whiting, S., Maltby, N., Diefenbach, G. J., Lothstein, M. A., Hardcastle, S., Catalano, A., & Gray, K.
Corresponding author
Tolin, David F.
ORCID
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
332-344
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.02.003
OpenAlex
W2051219010
Cited by
62
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
school refusal, cognitive behavioral therapy, parent training, functional analysis, adolescents, treatment response, follow-up outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review