Cited by 21Youth Substance Use and School AttendancePsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

An open trial of intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy for school refusal

Hannan, Scott, Davis, Elizabeth, Morrison, Samantha, Gueorguieva, Ralitza, Tolin, David F.·2019·Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been used to address the myriad of problems within cases presenting with school refusal. Although CBT for school refusal shows promise in increasing attendance, results to date have been mixed. Treatment studies on CBT for school refusal differ in regards to the dosage of CBT (i.e. session time and frequency) provided. The current study examined the use of intensive CBT, in which sessions lasting 1.5–2 hours were delivered on a daily basis. Altogether, 25 participants were enrolled in an intensive CBT school refusal program. Based upon their needs, individual treatment interventions were designed that incorporated standard CBT procedures, as well as interventions specific to the needs of a student/family. Treatment was delivered on a daily basis over 3 weeks. At pretreatment, all students were spending less than 90% of time in their assigned school/classes, with 88% not attending any school. At posttreatment, 60% of students were attending school at greater than 90% attendance. Intensive CBT for school refusal shows promise in increasing time spent in school. It allows clinicians the necessary time to address maintaining factors of school refusal within a short timeframe (daily). In addition, it allows extended time in session to build skills and also address any daily issues that arise. Further study is needed to directly compare intensive CBT to CBT on a weekly basis and to examine the student characteristics associated with response to treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23794925.2019.1575706

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannan, S., Davis, E., Morrison, S., Gueorguieva, R., & Tolin, D. F.
Affiliations
  • The Institute of Living, Anxiety Disorders Center, Hartford, CT, USA
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Hannan, Scott
Venue
Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Published
2019-01-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
89-101
ISSN
  • 2379-4925 (ISSN-L)
  • 2379-4933
OpenAlex
W2912480514
Cited by
21
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
school refusal, school absenteeism, school attendance, child and adolescent mental health, treatment dosage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review