The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 14 of the 43 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Modulation of K-Ras-Dependent Lung Tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21
Open accessAbstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world, and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of cases. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) expression is increased and predicts poor survival in NSCLC. Although miR-21 function has been studied in vitro with cancer cell lines, the role of miR-21 in tumor development in vivo is unknown. We utilize transgenic mice with loss-of-function and gain-of-function miR-21 alleles combined with a model of NSCLC to determine the role of miR-21 in lung cancer. We show that overexpression of miR-21 enhances tumorigenesis and that genetic deletion of miR-21 partially protects against tumor formation. MiR-21 drives tumorigenesis through inhibition of negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway and inhibition of apoptosis.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a K-rasLA2 mouse model of NSCLC, miR-21 overexpression increased lung tumor number/area and proliferation, while miR-21 deletion reduced tumor burden and sensitized transformed MEFs to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis. miR-21 acts as a tumor promoter by repressing Ras/MEK/ERK negative regulators (Spry1, Spry2, Btg2, Pdcd4) and pro-apoptotic genes (Apaf1, Faslg, Pdcd4, RhoB).
Key findings
- CAG-miR-21;K-rasLA2 mice overexpressing miR-21 4–6 fold had significantly more gross lung tumors at 18 weeks and increased microscopic tumor number and total tumor area versus K-rasLA2 littermates; tumors showed increased proliferation, but survival did not differ, possibly due to decreased thymic tumor incidence.
- miR-21−/−;K-rasLA2 mice had significantly fewer surface lung tumors at 20 weeks and decreased total tumor area; no adenocarcinomas were noted in any of 14 miR-21−/−/K-rasLA2 animals evaluated, and miR-21 deletion did not alter Ki67 proliferation.
- miR-21 overexpression alone was not sufficient for tumorigenesis: CAG-miR-21 mice without K-rasLA2 (n = 39) followed up to 555 days showed no tumors.
- Reporter assays showed 13 of 24 putative mouse miR-21 target 3′UTRs were repressed by miR-21, with mutation of the miR-21 site abrogating repression in 11; in tumors, miR-21 overexpression decreased Spry1, Spry2, Btg2, Pdcd4, Apaf1, Faslg, and RhoB and increased ERK phosphorylation. K-ras activation increased miR-21 expression 4-fold; miR-21−/− MEFs formed fewer soft agar colonies and smaller xenograft tumors and showed increased doxorubicin-induced apoptosis.
Methods
- Generated conditional CAG-miR-21 overexpressing and miR-21−/− mice, crossed to the K-rasLA2 NSCLC model; comparisons were to littermate controls, with tumor burden assessed by H&E/ImageJ, proliferation by Ki67, and apoptosis by TUNEL.
- MEFs from wild-type and miR-21−/− mice were immortalized with SV40 large T/small t and transformed with H-rasG12V; assays included soft agar, xenografts, doxorubicin treatment (100 nM–10 μM for 12 h), and TUNEL (1 μM for 12 h).
- Luciferase reporter assays tested 24 putative miR-21 target 3′UTRs; Western blots were performed on micro-dissected tumors; statistics used two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test with p < 0.05 considered significant.
Limitations
- No formal limitations section is present; the authors state miR-21 overexpression alone was not sufficient for tumorigenesis and that tumors arising after miR-21 deletion may have developed escape mechanisms, possibly explaining latency.
- The text notes miR-21 deletion did not alter apoptosis in lung lesions, suggesting those tumors escaped miR-21 regulatory effects; no adenocarcinomas were observed in 14 miR-21−/−;K-rasLA2 animals, a limited sample for that endpoint.
- Evident from the text: all mice used were of mixed genetic backgrounds, and findings are from a mouse K-rasLA2 model and transformed MEFs, so human NSCLC causality and therapeutic implications remain to be tested.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 of 43 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Four of the validated miR-21 target genes are known negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway: sprouty 1 (Spry1), sprouty 2 (Spry2), B-cell translocation gene 2 (Btg2), and programmed cell death 4 (Pdcd4).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 targets multiple tumor suppressor genes
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Casci et al., 1999 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion identifies Drosophila Sprouty as an inhibitor of Ras/MAP kinase signaling. The paper predicts that mammalian Sprouty homologs may have the same function, but does not establish it for Spry1 or Spry2 specifically. It does not address Btg2, Pdcd4, or whether these genes are validated miR-21 targets. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hanafusa et al., 2002 source
- Not matchedcites Lo et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Oncogenic Ras activation has been shown to increase the expression of Spry2, providing feedback inhibition of Ras activation (Shaw et al., 2007).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Shaw et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Negative feedback signaling in development” (page not available), the paper reports that oncogenic K-ras up-regulates Spry-2 and that Spry-2 inhibits MAPK activation. It does not establish that Spry-2 inhibits activation of Ras itself; it describes possible effects at different points in the Ras/MAPK pathway, including downstream of activated K-ras. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show that over-expression of miR-21 enhances tumorigenesis and genetic deletion of miR-21 partially protects against tumor formation.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show that over-expression of miR-21 enhances tumorigenesis and genetic deletion of miR-21 partially protects against tumor formation.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“K-ras activation in the tumors of K-rasLA2 mice increased miR-21 expression 4-fold similar to the expression level in the CAG-miR-21 transgenic mouse lung.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > Oncogenic Ras activation increases miR-21 expression In vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total tumor area as a proportion of total lung area was significantly decreased with miR-21 deletion (Figure 2D).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 deletion suppresses tumor development In vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MiR-21 over-expression in CAG-miR-21;K-rasLA2 mutant tumors decreases Spry1, Spry2, and Btg2 protein expression compared to K-rasLA2 tumors (Figure 4C).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 targets multiple negative regulators of Ras signaling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The antibodies used in Western blots specifically detect the intended target proteins.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is may be explained by a decreased incidence of thymic tumors in CAG-miR-21;K-rasLA2 mutant mice compared to K-rasLA2 controls (Figure 1I), thus contributing to the enhanced survival.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 over-expression promotes tumor development In vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no difference in proliferation between the miR-21−/− and wild type MEFs (Figure S2C).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 deletion suppresses Ras-driven transformation In vitro
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total tumor area as a proportion of total lung area was significantly increased with miR-21 over-expression (Figure 1E).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 over-expression promotes tumor development In vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 25
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Recently, miR-21 expression levels have proven useful prognostic markers in non-small cell lung cancer (Markou et al., 2008; Yanaihara et al., 2006).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Markou et al., 2008 source
The discussion reports that mature miR-21 overexpression in NSCLC was associated with lung-cancer death and was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. The authors caution that the small number of events requires further confirmation, so the finding should not be read as a validated clinical test. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Yanaihara et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that high hsa-mir-21 expression was associated with significantly worse survival in lung adenocarcinoma patients. They do not establish miR-21 as a validated prognostic marker across non-small cell lung cancer: the reported prognostic validation focused on other miRNAs. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The level of miR-21 expression in sputum distinguishes NSCLC patients from cancer-free controls with a greater sensitivity than conventional cytology (Xie et al., 2009).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Xie et al., 2009 source
The Results section, under “Comparison of cytology and measurement of altered miRNA expression in sputum,” reports 69.66% sensitivity for sputum miR-21 measurement versus 47.82% for conventional sputum cytology. The study examined sputum from 23 NSCLC patients and 17 cancer-free subjects, matching the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Several components of the PI3K pathway, including PTEN and PIK3R1, have been suggested as miR-21 target genes (Meng et al., 2007); however, miR-21 over-expression did not alter PTEN and PIK3R1 protein expression or Akt phosphorylation (Figure S3B).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 targets multiple negative regulators of Ras signaling
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Meng et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results identify PTEN as a miR-21 target, and the Discussion places PTEN in the PI3K pathway. The passages do not identify PIK3R1 as a miR-21 target. The statement that over-expression did not alter protein expression or Akt phosphorylation is attributed to the citing paper’s Figure S3B, not to Meng et al. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The antibodies used in Western blots specifically detect the intended target proteins.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Targeted deletion of miR-21 in RKO and DLD1 colon cancer cells revealed miR-21 contributes to tumorigenesis through compromising cell cycle progression and DNA damage-induced checkpoint function through the Cdc25a target gene (Wang et al., 2009).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Wang et al., 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report targeted miR-21 deletion in RKO and DLD1 cells, and the Discussion links miR-21, Cdc25A, cell-cycle progression, and checkpoint activation. However, the Discussion describes a contribution to tumorigenesis as a possibility, not a demonstrated outcome; the claim's “revealed” overstates that conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“As well, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2/neu signaling positively regulates miR-21 expression in human lung and breast carcinoma cell lines, respectively (Huang et al., 2009; Seike et al., 2009).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > Oncogenic Ras activation increases miR-21 expression In vivo
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Huang et al., 2009 source
The paired citations and “respectively” attribute the HER2/neu finding in breast carcinoma cells to Huang et al. In “Ectopic Expression of HER2/neu Induces miR-21 Upregulation” (Fig. 1A; page not provided), the paper reports that HER2/neu expression increased miR-21 in a human breast cancer cell line. The EGFR finding in lung cells is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Seike et al., 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Zhang et al. showed in a human gastric cancer cell line that forced over-expression of miR-21 enhanced tumor proliferation and invasion”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Zhang et al., 2008 source
In the Results sections on proliferation and invasion (page numbers not provided), the paper reports that transfecting AGS human gastric cancer cells with a miR-21 expression construct significantly increased proliferation and strengthened invasion. This matches the claim about forced over-expression in a human gastric cancer cell line. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“SPRY2, in turn, negatively regulates Ras/MEK/ERK signaling and is a tumor suppressor in NSCLC in both mice (Minowada and Miller, 2004; Minowada and Miller, 2009; Shaw et al., 2007) and humans (Sutterluty et al., 2007).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Minowada and Miller, 2004 source
- Partly supportedcites Minowada and Miller, 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The study summary and Discussion (page unavailable) report fewer and smaller urethane-induced lung tumors in mice overexpressing Sprouty 2, supporting a tumor-suppressive effect in that mouse model. The Discussion says the findings are consistent with antagonism of Ras signaling, but the mechanism remains unclear; this paper does not demonstrate inhibition of MEK/ERK signaling. The citing sentence attributes the human NSCLC portion to a separate citation, not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Supportedcites Shaw et al., 2007 source
The Negative feedback signaling in development section reports that Spry-2 inhibits MAPK activation in K-ras G12D mouse lungs. The tumor-suppression section concludes that Spry-2 limits K-ras-driven mouse lung tumor development; a correction in Additional information says its revised results do not change that conclusion. The citing sentence attributes the human finding to Sutterluty et al., not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“All tumors from the survival cohort were analyzed on H&E sections and categorized as hyperplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, adenoma, adenoma with typia, and adenocarcinoma according to the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium recommendations.(Nikitin et al., 2004)”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES > Tumor Grading
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Nikitin et al., 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Development of Recommendations section says the consortium prepared and reviewed H&E-stained sections, and the classification defines hyperplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, adenoma, and adenocarcinoma. The cited paper does not identify “adenoma with typia” as a recommended category. The survival-cohort analysis describes the citing authors’ own work, not an analysis reported by Nikitin et al. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“knock-down of miR-21 resulted in a marked reduction in proliferation and increase in apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2008).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Zhang et al., 2008 source
The Abstract states that inhibiting miR-21 in AGS human gastric cancer cells significantly reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis. The ‘miR-21 Increases Cell Proliferation and Inhibits Cell Apoptosis’ section reports both effects after transfection with an anti-miR-21 inhibitor. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Methods have been developed to manipulate miRNA function pharmacologically, facilitating the development of new cancer therapeutic strategies (Hutvagner et al., 2004; Krutzfeldt et al., 2005).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Hutvagner et al., 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion report that 2′-O-methyl oligonucleotides inhibit specific miRNAs and can be used to study their function in C. elegans. The paper presents them as a research tool; it does not establish that they facilitate new cancer therapeutic strategies. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Krutzfeldt et al., 2005 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RECK, Cdc25a, Map2k3, NfiB, Trp63 and Ski have been shown to be miR-21 target genes in vitro, but only RECK showed decreased protein levels in the CAG-miR-21;K-rasLA2 tumors (Figure S3A).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 targets multiple negative regulators of Ras signaling
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The antibodies used in Western blots specifically detect the intended target proteins.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MiR21−/−;K-rasLA2 mice all develop lung tumors, but show an increased incidence of thymic lymphoma (Figure 2F).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 deletion suppresses tumor development In vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Caspase 3 and K-ras do not contain miR-21 sites in their 3′ UTR and the 3′ UTR luciferase reporter activity is not suppressed by miR-21 (Figure 3B).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 targets multiple tumor suppressor genes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The decrease in Spry1, Spry2, and Btg2 in CAG-miR-21;K-rasLA2 tumors correlates with increased Ras pathway activity, shown by increased ERK phosphorylation (Figure 4C).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 targets multiple negative regulators of Ras signaling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The antibodies used in Western blots specifically detect the intended target proteins.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show miR-21 dependent repression of the mouse Apaf1 3′ UTR reporter; however, the miR-21 site in the human APAF1 3′ UTR is conserved in primates but not conserved in the mouse.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 targets multiple tumor suppressor genes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“adult male CAG-miR-21 mice showed no signs of heart failure compared to littermate controls (Figure S1E)(van Rooij et al., 2006; van Rooij et al., 2008).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 over-expression promotes tumor development In vivo
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Apaf1, Pdcd4, Faslg, and RhoB were validated as direct miR-21 target genes by luciferase reporter assays; however, caspase 3 was not directly regulated by miR-21 (Figure 3B).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 suppresses apoptosis by targeting proapoptotic genes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The luciferase reporter assays in COS cells reflect endogenous miR-21 target regulation in mouse lung tumors.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MiR-21 over-expression increased the incidence of all tumor grades without increasing the rate of conversion to adenocarcinoma, suggesting that miR-21 participates in tumor promotion rather than progression and metastasis in this model (Figure 1J and 1K).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 over-expression promotes tumor development In vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike K-rasLA1;p53−/− compound mutant mice (Johnson et al., 2001), we did not observe an increased tumor spectrum or increased metastasis in the CAG-miR-21;K-rasLA2 mutant mice.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 over-expression promotes tumor development In vivo
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although miR-21 function has been studied in vitro using cancer cell lines, the role of miR-21 in tumor development in vivo is unknown.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MiR-21 drives tumorigenesis through inhibition of negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway and inhibition of apoptosis.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A large scale survey to determine the miRNA signature of 540 tumor samples including lung, breast, stomach, prostate, colon, and pancreatic tumors and their respective normal adjacent tissue revealed miR-21 was the only miRNA up-regulated in all these tumors (Volinia et al., 2006).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Volinia et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Further miRNA profiling in tumor samples and cancer cell lines show increased miR-21 expression in glioblastoma (Chan et al., 2005; Ciafre et al., 2005), head and neck carcinomas (Tran et al., 2007), ovarian cancer (Iorio et al., 2007), B-cell lymphoma (Lawrie et al., 2007), hepatocellular (Meng et al., 2007), and cervical carcinoma (Lui et al., 2007).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CAG-miR-21 transgenic mice were viable, fertile and born in expected Mendelian ratios.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 over-expression promotes tumor development In vivo
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Knock-down of miR-21 in the metastatic breast cancer MD-MBA-231 cells reduced invasion and metastasis (Zhu et al., 2008).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zhu et al., 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Homozygous miR-21 knock-out mice are viable, fertile, and born in expected Mendelian ratios without any gross phenotypic differences compared to wild type or heterozygous littermates, and without a cardiac phenotype (D.P., E.V.R. and E.N.O., manuscript in preparation).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 deletion suppresses Ras-driven transformation In vitro
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The miR-21 knockout mice do not have compensatory molecular changes that confound the interpretation of tumorigenesis experiments.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data illustrate that miR-21 over-expression decreases the protein expression of four miR-21 target genes that are involved in apoptosis thus promoting survival.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 suppresses apoptosis by targeting proapoptotic genes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The antibodies used in Western blots specifically detect the intended target proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The luciferase reporter assays in COS cells reflect endogenous miR-21 target regulation in mouse lung tumors.
In the paper
“miR-21 expression was induced by AP-1 in response to Ras activation, and miR-21 mediated Ras-dependent downregulation of Pdcd4 (Talotta et al., 2009)”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > Oncogenic Ras activation increases miR-21 expression In vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Talotta et al., 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Knockdown of miR-21 in cultured glioblastoma cells activates caspases leading to apoptotic cell death, suggesting miR-21 is an anti-apoptotic factor (Chan et al., 2005).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chan et al., 2005 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“K-rasLA2 mice develop multi-focal lung tumors with 100% penetrance, and less frequently develop thymic lymphomas and skin papillomas (Johnson et al., 2001).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 over-expression promotes tumor development In vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Johnson et al., 2001 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest that miR-21 over-expression in human tumors does not simply reflect cancer pathology, but instead enhances aspects of the pathology of NSCLC.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 over-expression promotes tumor development In vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The K-rasLA2 mouse model is a valid model of human NSCLC for studying miR-21.
- Rests on an assumption: The level of miR-21 over-expression achieved in CAG-miR-21 mice (4–6 fold) is representative of the increased miR-21 expression in human NSCLC.
In the paper
“Previously, an autoregulatory loop connecting miR-21 and Ras activation through AP-1 was illustrated in a rat thyroid cell system (Talotta et al., 2009).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > Oncogenic Ras activation increases miR-21 expression In vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Talotta et al., 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data show that miR-21 over-expression decreases the protein expression of four miR-21 target genes that are tumor suppressors and negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway resulting in a concomitant increased ERK activity.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > RESULTS > miR-21 targets multiple negative regulators of Ras signaling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The antibodies used in Western blots specifically detect the intended target proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The luciferase reporter assays in COS cells reflect endogenous miR-21 target regulation in mouse lung tumors.
In the paper
“In breast cancer MCF-7 cells, miR-21 knock-down results in suppression of cell growth in vitro and tumor growth in xenografts (Si et al., 2007).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Si et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All mice used in these studies were of mixed genetic backgrounds and all comparisons were performed on littermate controls.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES > Mouse Strains
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PDCD4 is a pro-apoptotic tumor suppressor gene and has been verified as a miR-21 target in human colorectal and breast cancer cell lines (Afonja et al., 2004; Asangani et al., 2007; Bitomsky et al., 2008; Frankel et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2006).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In laryngeal carcinoma, miR-21 targets BTG2 (Liu et al., 2009), a p53 target gene, recently shown to suppress oncogenic Ras activity by reducing the GTP bound, active state (Buganim et al., 2010).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Knock-down of miR-21 in glioblastoma cell lines triggers the activation of caspases and increases apoptosis (Chan et al., 2005).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chan et al., 2005 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“RhoB promotes growth inhibition and induces apoptosis in cancer cells (Kim et al., 2009)”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kim et al., 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the reductions in protein levels of individual miR-21 targets appear modest with miR-21 over-expression, collectively this diminution of tumor suppressor activity allows for more robust tumor formation through relieving multiple nodes of inhibition of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway, thus facilitating tumor proliferation.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The K-rasLA2 mouse model is a valid model of human NSCLC for studying miR-21.
- Rests on an assumption: The antibodies used in Western blots specifically detect the intended target proteins.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show that Ras activation increases miR-21 expression and in turn decreasing the expression of Spry2.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The K-rasLA2 mouse model is a valid model of human NSCLC for studying miR-21.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“miR-21 modulates several components critical to NSCLC pathogenesis through both relieving antagonism of the Ras pathway and reducing apoptotic effectors (Figure 7).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The K-rasLA2 mouse model is a valid model of human NSCLC for studying miR-21.
In the paper
“RhoB expression is down-regulated in human NSCLC suggesting a role as a tumor suppressor gene (Sato et al., 2007).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sato et al., 2007 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Relieving miR-21 inhibition of pro-apoptotic genes could provide a means to augment the effect of current chemotherapy.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Apaf1, Faslg, Pdcd4 and RhoB promote apoptosis.
In the paper
“MiR-21 targets SPRY2 in cardiomyocytes and SW480 colon cancer cells, enhancing cell migration (Sayed et al., 2008).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sayed et al., 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results show that miR-21 expression modulates tumor number, incidence and size in a mouse lung cancer model initiated by oncogenic K-rasG12D, consistent with miR-21 functioning as a tumor promoter.”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The K-rasLA2 mouse model is a valid model of human NSCLC for studying miR-21.
- Rests on an assumption: The level of miR-21 over-expression achieved in CAG-miR-21 mice (4–6 fold) is representative of the increased miR-21 expression in human NSCLC.
In the paper
“Pdcd4 functions both as an inducer of apoptosis and a suppressor of AP-1 activity (Hwang et al., 2007).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hwang et al., 2007 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Loss of PDCD4 expression in human lung cancer correlates with higher grade and disease stage (Chen et al., 2003).”
§ Modulation of K-ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by microRNA-21 > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chen et al., 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The K-rasLA2 mouse model is a valid model of human NSCLC for studying miR-21.
“To explore the role of miR-21 in the pathogenesis of NSCLC, we utilized the K-rasLA2 murine lung cancer model, which harbors a targeted, latent K-ras G12D allele that is activated by two distinct recombination events (Johnson et al., 2001).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The level of miR-21 over-expression achieved in CAG-miR-21 mice (4–6 fold) is representative of the increased miR-21 expression in human NSCLC.
“which globally over-expressed miR-21 4–6 fold over normal levels of expression (Figure S1B–D).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The miR-21 knockout mice do not have compensatory molecular changes that confound the interpretation of tumorigenesis experiments.
“Homozygous miR-21 knock-out mice are viable, fertile, and born in expected Mendelian ratios without any gross phenotypic differences compared to wild type or heterozygous littermates, and without a cardiac phenotype (D.P., E.V.R. and E.N.O., manuscript in preparation).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The antibodies used in Western blots specifically detect the intended target proteins.
“We isolated individual tumors from mice, made whole tumor lysates, and performed Western blots for putative miR-21 targets to address the effect of miR-21 expression on the protein levels of the miR-21 target genes in vivo within lung tumors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The luciferase reporter assays in COS cells reflect endogenous miR-21 target regulation in mouse lung tumors.
“Reporter assays in COS cells revealed miR-21 dependent repression of 13 of the 24 3′UTRs”
The paper relies on this without support.
MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that are commonly dysregulated in human malignancies and play a substantial role in the pathogenesis and survival of many cancers.
“MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that are commonly dysregulated in human malignancies and play a substantial role in the pathogenesis and survival of many cancers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
MiR-21 is over-expressed in the majority of human malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
“MiR-21 is over-expressed in the majority of human malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not clear whether miR-21 determines important aspects of lung cancer pathogenesis or is instead simply a marker for advanced disease.
“However, it is not clear whether miR-21 determines important aspects of lung cancer pathogenesis or is instead simply a marker for advanced disease.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Spry1, Spry2, Btg2, and Pdcd4 act as negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway.
“which act as negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway”
The paper relies on this without support.
Apaf1, Faslg, Pdcd4 and RhoB promote apoptosis.
“which promote apoptosis”
Citations
Cites
Bartel (2004) · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5 · Cited by 34,714
Lewis, B. P., Burge, C. B., & Bartel, D. P. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035 · Cited by 11,855 · cited 2×
“Expression of approximately 30% of human proteins appears to be regulated by miRNAs (Lewis et al., 2005).”
MicroRNA signatures in human cancers
Calin, G. A., & Croce, C. M. (2006) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1997 · Cited by 7,668 · cited 2×
“…including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Volinia et al., 2006), and are predictive of tumor classification, prognosis, and response to therapy (Calin and Croce, 2006). miRNA expression patterns are remarkably reliable markers of cancers; in some cases, they have even proven more reliable than…”
Oncomirs—MicroRNAs with a role in cancer
Esquela-Kerscher, A., & Slack, F. J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1840 · Cited by 5,884 · cited 4×
“MicroRNAs are evolutionarily conserved, endogenous, nonprotein-coding, 20–23 nucleotide single-stranded RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression in a sequence-specific manner (Cho, 2007; Esquela-Kerscher and Slack, 2006; Voorhoeve and Agami, 2007).”
InfluentialA microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets
Volinia, S., Calin, G. A., Liu, C.-G., Ambs, S., Cimmino, A., Petrocca, F., Visone, R., Iorio, M., Roldo, C., Ferracin, M., et al. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0510565103 · Cited by 5,697 · cited 4×
“A large-scale survey to determine the miRNA signature of 540 tumor samples—including lung, breast, stomach, prostate, colon, and pancreatic tumors and their respective normal adjacent tissue—revealed miR-21 was the only miRNA upregulated in all these tumors (Volinia et al., 2006).”
InfluentialCombinatorial microRNA target predictions
Krek, A., Grün, D., Poy, M. N., Wolf, R., Rosenberg, L., Epstein, E. J., MacMenamin, P., da Piedade, I., Gunsalus, K. C., Stoffel, M., et al. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1536 · Cited by 4,603 · cited 2×
“, 2007), and PicTar (Krek et al., 2005).”
Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’
Krützfeldt, J., Rajewsky, N., Braich, R., Rajeev, K. G., Tuschl, T., Manoharan, M., & Stoffel, M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04303 · Cited by 3,949 · cited 2×
“Methods have been developed to manipulate miRNA function pharmacologically, facilitating the development of new cancer therapeutic strategies (Hutvagner et al., 2004; Krutzfeldt et al., 2005).”
MicroRNA Targeting Specificity in Mammals: Determinants beyond Seed Pairing
Grimson, A., Farh, K. K.-H., Johnston, W. K., Garrett-Engele, P., Lim, L. P., & Bartel, D. P. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.017 · Cited by 3,766 · cited 2×
“Can miR-21 Targets Multiple Tumor Suppressor Genes To identify miR-21 effectors responsible for phenotypes observed, we utilized two algorithms that predict the mRNA targets of miRNAs, TargetScan (Grimson et al., 2007), and PicTar (Krek et al.”
The impact of microRNAs on protein output
Baek, D., Villén, J., Shin, C., Camargo, F. D., Gygi, S. P., & Bartel, D. P. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07242 · Cited by 3,592 · cited 2×
“Through interactions with 30 UTRs, miRNAs can modulate the expression of many genes simultaneously, often regulating individual signaling pathways at multiple levels (Baek et al., 2008; Selbach et al., 2008).”
Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs
Selbach, M., Schwanhäusser, B., Thierfelder, N., Fang, Z., Khanin, R., & Rajewsky, N. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07228 · Cited by 3,429 · cited 2×
“Through interactions with 30 UTRs, miRNAs can modulate the expression of many genes simultaneously, often regulating individual signaling pathways at multiple levels (Baek et al., 2008; Selbach et al., 2008).”
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 625
miRNA-Based Therapeutic Strategies
Ishida, M., & Selaru, F. M. (2012) · Current Pathobiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40139-012-0004-5 · Cited by 121
“miRNA21 was associated with a variety of cancers, including leukemia [51], lung [52], liver [50], stomach [53], pancreas [54], and brain [55].”
MicroRNAs, diet, and cancer: New mechanistic insights on the epigenetic actions of phytochemicals
Parasramka, M. A., Ho, E., Williams, D. E., & Dashwood, R. H. (2011) · Molecular Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1002/mc.20822 · Cited by 115
“stimulated by p53 [95,96], miR-21 regulation modulated by ras [97], and regulation of the miR-17-92 cluster and miR-9 by myc and mycn in lymphoma”
BackgroundNana-Sinkam, S. P., & Croce, C. M. (2014) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0445-8 · Cited by 114
“[71] demonstrated that miR-21 is a potent driver of lung tumorigenesis in a murine model of Kras-induced lung adenocarcinoma.”
BackgroundWanted DEAD/H or Alive: Helicases Winding Up in Cancers
Cai, W., Chen, Z. X., Rane, G., Singh, S. S., Choo, Z., Wang, C., Yuan, Y., Tan, T. Z., Arfuso, F., Yap, C. T., et al. (2016) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djw278 · Cited by 116
Non‐coding RNAs in cancer initiation and progression and as novel biomarkers
Nana-Sinkam, S. P., & Croce, C. M. (2011) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2011.10.003 · Cited by 110
“Investigators have known for quite some time that microvesicles could carry molecules implicated in carcinogenesis (Hawari et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2002).”
BackgroundFerraro, A., Kontos, C. K., Boni, T., Bantounas, I., Siakouli, D., Kosmidou, V., Vlassi, M., Spyridakis, Y., Tsipras, I., Zografos, G., et al. (2014) · Epigenetics · doi:10.4161/epi.26842 · Cited by 111
MicroRNA-31 initiates lung tumorigenesis and promotes mutant KRAS-driven lung cancer
Edmonds, M. D., Boyd, K. L., Moyo, T. K., Mitra, R., Duszynski, R. J., Arrate, M. P., Chen, X., Zhao, Z., Blackwell, T. S., Andl, T., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci82720 · Cited by 109
“However, miR-21 was able to enhance mutant KRAS-driven lung tumor growth in vivo (6).”
BackgroundRibas, J., Ni, X., Castanares, M. A., Liu, M. M., Esopi, D., Yegnasubramanian, S., Rodríguez, R., Mendell, J. T., & Lupold, S. E. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks308 · Cited by 112
“Similarly, miR-21 deletion in mouse cancer models reduced tumor formation (26,27).”
Multifunctional nanoparticles for use in theranostic applications
Cole, J. T., & Holland, N. B. (2015) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-015-0218-2 · Cited by 109
Coppola, V., Musumeci, M., Patrizii, M., Cannistraci, A., Addario, A., Maugeri‐Saccà, M., Biffoni, M., Francescangeli, F., Cordenonsi, M., Piccolo, S., et al. (2012) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2012.194 · Cited by 109
Down‐regulation of miR‐21 biogenesis by estrogen action contributes to osteoclastic apoptosis
Sugatani, T., & Hruska, K. A. (2012) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.24471 · Cited by 106
“, 2010] and CAG-Z-miR-21-EGFP transgenic [Hatley et al., 2010] mice were obtained from Dr.”
MethodThe Oncogenic MicroRNA-21 Inhibits the Tumor Suppressive Activity of FBXO11 to Promote Tumorigenesis
Yang, C. H., Pfeffer, S. R., Sims, M. M., Yue, J., Wang, Y., Linga, V. G., Paulus, E. M., Davidoff, A. M., & Pfeffer, L. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.632125 · Cited by 105
“Moreover, miR-21 expression modulates tumor number, incidence and size in a K-ras-dependent mouse lung cancer model (7).”
BackgroundKang, H., Davis‐Dusenbery, B. N., Nguyen, P. H., Lal, A., Lieberman, J., Aelst, L. V., Lagna, G., & Hata, A. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.303156 · Cited by 102
Han, Z., Yang, Q., Liu, B., Wu, J., Li, Y., Yang, C., & Jiang, Y. (2011) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgr226 · Cited by 102
Huang, Y., Yang, Y. B., Zhang, X. H., Yu, X. L., Wang, Z. B., & Cheng, X. C. (2012) · Medical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12032-012-0376-8 · Cited by 102
“In K-rasdependent mouse lung cancers, an increase occurs in miRNA-21 expression; miRNA-21 targets multiple negative regulators of the Ras/methylethyl ketone/extracellular receptor kinase pathway to promote proliferation by regulating the expression of Spry1, Spry2, Btg2, and Pdcd4 [69, 70].”
BackgroundMolecular genetics and cellular events of K-Ras-driven tumorigenesis
Jinesh, G. G., Sambandam, V., Vijayaraghavan, S., Balaji, K., & Mukherjee, S. (2017) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2017.377 · Cited by 100
Sakai, A., & Suzuki, H. (2013) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.089 · Cited by 97
Banjo, T., Grajcarek, J., Yoshino, D., Osada, H., Miyasaka, K. Y., Kida, Y. S., Ueki, Y., NAGAYAMA, K., Kawakami, K., MATSUMOTΟ, T., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2978 · Cited by 98
The oncogenic microRNA miR-21 promotes regulated necrosis in mice
Ma, X., Conklin, D. J., Li, F., Dai, Z., Xiang, H., Li, Y., Xu-Monette, Z. Y., Young, K. H., Xiong, W., Wysoczynski, M., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8151 · Cited by 98
Xu, G., Zhang, Y., Wei, J., Jia, W. P., Ge, Z., Zhang, Z., & Liu, X. (2013) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-469 · Cited by 95
“Similarly, loss-of-function study using a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) transgenic mouse model also suggested that genetic deletion of miR-21 allele was capable of partially protecting the mice from tumor formation [41].”
BackgroundMethodLopatina, T., Gai, C., Deregibus, M. C., Kholia, S., & Camussi, G. (2016) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2016.00125 · Cited by 100
Yang, Y., Meng, H., Peng, Q., Yang, X., Gan, R., Zhao, L., Chen, Z., Lu, J., & Meng, Q. H. (2014) · Cancer Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/cgt.2014.66 · Cited by 94
Yan, F., Shen, N., Pang, J., Xie, D., Deng, B., Molina, J. R., Yang, P., & Liu, S. (2014) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.380 · Cited by 94
“, miR-29b).(7,25) We and others demonstrated that the levels of DNMT1 or DNMT3a or DNMT3b are regulated by miR-29b, miR-148, miR-152 or miR-30c,(7,13,26,27) and overexpression of these miRs results in DNA hypomethylation and TSG reactivation with the concurrent blockage of cancer cell proliferation.”
BackgroundVescovo, V. D., & Denti, M. A. (2015) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23730-5_9 · Cited by 92
“Overexpression of miR-21 augmented tumorigenesis by repression of negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway and inhibition of apoptosis too [ 29 ].”
BackgroundMicroRNA-21 regulates T-cell apoptosis by directly targeting the tumor suppressor gene Tipe2
Ruan, Q., Wang, P., Wang, T., Qi, J., Wei, M. H., Wang, S., Fan, T., Johnson, D., Wan, X., Shi, W., et al. (2014) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.47 · Cited by 96
MicroRNA-21 Aggravates Cyst Growth in a Model of Polycystic Kidney Disease
Lakhia, R., Hajarnis, S. S., Williams, D., Aboudehen, K., Yheskel, M., Xing, C., Hatley, M. E., Torres, V. E., Wallace, D. P., & Patel, V. (2015) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2015060634 · Cited by 92
Self-citationAKR1C1 Activates STAT3 to Promote the Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Zhu, H., CHANG, L.-L., Yan, F., Hu, Y. W., Zeng, C., Zhou, T., Yuan, T., Ying, M., Cao, J., He, Q., et al. (2017) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.21463 · Cited by 93
“Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide [1], accounting for ~80% of all lung cancer cases [2].”
BackgroundUsing microRNA Networks to Understand Cancer
Dragomir, M. P., Mafra, A. C. P., Dias, S. M. G., Vasilescu, C., & Călin, G. A. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19071871 · Cited by 93
“Also, overexpression of miR-21 is associated with poorer prognosis in lung cancer, since it directly targets the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway [33].”
BackgroundDmitriev, P., Barat, A., Polesskaya, A., O’Connell, M. J., Robert, T., Dessen, P., Walsh, T., Lazar, V., Turki, A., Carnac, G., et al. (2013) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-265 · Cited by 89
“It has been demonstrated that miR-21 targets genes involved in in apoptosis [51,52] and regulation of kinase activity [53-56] and regulation of gene expression [57].”
BackgroundImmunomodulatory MicroRNAs in cancer: targeting immune checkpoints and the tumor microenvironment
Omar, H. A., El-Serafi, A. T., Hersi, F., Arafa, E. A., Zaher, D. M., Madkour, M. I., Arab, H. H., & Tolba, M. F. (2019) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.15000 · Cited by 89
Li, Q., Wang, J.-X., He, Y., Feng, C., Zhang, X.-J., Sheng, J.-Q., & Li, P.-F. (2014) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.148 · Cited by 86
“A great deal of miRNAs were identified as tumor suppressors;(6,7) some of these microRNAs have been proven to regulate chemosensitivity.(8,9) The involvement of miRNAs in chemoresistance need to be further investigated.”
BackgroundThe microRNA signatures: aberrantly expressed miRNAs in prostate cancer
Sharma, N., & Baruah, M. M. (2018) · Clinical & Translational Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12094-018-1910-8 · Cited by 88
CHO microRNA engineering is growing up: Recent successes and future challenges
Jadhav, V., Hackl, M., Druz, A., Shridhar, S., Chung, C., Heffner, K. M., Kreil, D. P., Betenbaugh, M., Shiloach, J., Barron, N., et al. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.07.007 · Cited by 94
“(Frezzetti et al., 2011; Guan et al., 2012; Hatley et al., 2010).”
Chemiluminescence Sensor for miRNA-21 Detection Based on CRISPR-Cas12a and Cation Exchange Reaction
Zhou, Y., Xie, S., Liu, B., Wang, C., Huang, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04484 · Cited by 86
MicroRNAs as biomarkers for human glioblastoma: progress and potential
Huang, S., Ali, N.-D., Zhong, L., & Shi, J. (2018) · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · doi:10.1038/aps.2017.173 · Cited by 85
EMT and induction of miR-21 mediate metastasis development in Trp53-deficient tumours
Bornachea, O., Santos, M., Martínez‐Cruz, A. B., García‐Escudero, R., Dueñas, M., Costa, C., Segrelles, C., Lorz, C., Buitrago, A., Sáiz-Ladera, C., et al. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00434 · Cited by 84
Li, L., Hou, D., Guo, Y.-L., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, C., & Zen, K. (2011) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1001633 · Cited by 83
Wang, D., Huang, J., & Hu, Z. (2011) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.011932 · Cited by 85
“Furthermore, miR-21 is an oncogene in vivo (32, 47).”
BackgroundCaviglia, J. M., Yan, J., Jang, M. K., Gwak, G., Affò, S., Yu, L., Olinga, P., Friedman, R. A., Chen, X., & Schwabe, R. F. (2017) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29627 · Cited by 81
“Moreover, compensation appears unlikely for the miR-21 knockout mouse as it is resistant to lung tumor development (26) and as other miR knockout mice do not show compensation (47).”
Petrek, H. E., & Yu, A. (2019) · Pharmacology Research & Perspectives · doi:10.1002/prp2.528 · Cited by 82
microRNA-21 Governs TORC1 Activation in Renal Cancer Cell Proliferation and Invasion
Dey, N., Das, F., Ghosh‐Choudhury, N., Mandal, C. C., Parekh, D. J., Block, K. L., Kasinath, B. S., Abboud, H. E., & Choudhury, G. G. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037366 · Cited by 81
Strategies to Modulate MicroRNA Functions for the Treatment of Cancer or Organ Injury
Lee, T. J., Yuan, X., Kerr, K. M., Yoo, J. Y., Kim, D., Kaur, B., & Eltzschig, H. K. (2020) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.119.019026 · Cited by 79
“…by negatively regulated multiple tumor suppressors, including Sprouty homolog 1, Sprouty homolog 2, BTG antiproliferation factor 2, and programmed cell death 4, through activation of the Ras/mitogen-activated proteinkinasekinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway (Hatley et al., 2010).”
BackgroundGenome-wide analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression signatures in cancer
Li, M., Fu, S., & Xiao, H. (2015) · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · doi:10.1038/aps.2015.67 · Cited by 80
M i R ‐21 Modulates h TERT Through a STAT 3‐Dependent Manner on Glioblastoma Cell Growth
Wang, Y., Sun, G., Luo, H., Wang, X., Lan, F., Yue, X., Fu, L., Pu, P., Kang, C., Liu, N., et al. (2012) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00349.x · Cited by 78
“Among oncomiRs, miR-21 has been overexpressed in a variety of cancer, including breast, lung, and colon cancer, as well as in glioblastoma (GBM) [2–5].”
Plasma and EBC microRNAs as early biomarkers of non-small-cell lung cancer
Mozzoni, P., Banda, I., Goldoni, M., et al. (2013) · Biomarkers · doi:10.3109/1354750x.2013.845610 · Cited by 78
“Finally, miRNA-21 drives tumourigenesis by inhibiting negative regulators of the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway and inhibiting apoptosis (Hatley et al., 2010).”
BackgroundmiR-193b/365a cluster controls progression of epidermal squamous cell carcinoma
Gastaldi, C., Bertero, T., Xu, N., et al. (2013) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgt490 · Cited by 77
MicroRNA-21: a ubiquitously expressed pro-survival factor in cancer and other diseases
Li, S., Liang, Z., Liu, X., & Zou, F. (2011) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/s11010-011-1052-6 · Cited by 78
“APAF1 was validated as a miR-21 target gene in a mouse model of non-small-cell lung cancer [32].”
Grignol, V. P., Fairchild, E. T., Zimmerer, J. M., Lesinski, G. B., Walker, M. J., MAGRO, C. M. J., Kacher, J. E., Karpa, V. I., Clark, J., Nuovo, G. J., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.288 · Cited by 79
“This finding goes along with recent papers that show a role for miR-21 in the induction of cancer cell proliferation (Zhang et al, 2008; Hatley et al, 2010).”
BackgroundMicroRNA-21 Identified as Predictor of Cancer Outcome: A Meta-Analysis
Zhu, W., & Xu, B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103373 · Cited by 75
“Altogether, the vital cellular pathways regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle such as Ras [47], p53 [48], PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway [49], as well as target genes compose an intricate network of mir-21 modulation.”
BackgroundNOS2 enhances KRAS‐induced lung carcinogenesis, inflammation and microRNA‐21 expression
Okayama, H., Saito, M., Oue, N., Weiss, J. M., Stauffer, J. K., Takenoshita, S., Wiltrout, R. H., Hussain, S. P., & Harris, C. C. (2012) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.27644 · Cited by 75
“demonstrated an in vivo autoregulatory loop between oncogenic Ras and miR21 by using gain-of-function transgenic mice and loss-offunction KO mice of miR-21 allele in combination with the KRAS lung cancer mouse model.(17) The authors showed that Ras activation increases the expression of miR-21, and in turn, miR-21 enh…”
MethodHarel, S. A., Moshe, N. B. B., Aylon, Y., Bublik, D. R., Moskovits, N. B.-C., Toperoff, G., Azaiza, D., Biagoni, F., Fuchs, G., Wilder, S., et al. (2015) · Cell Death and Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2014.221 · Cited by 76
Interaction of the oncogenic miR-21 microRNA and the p53 tumor suppressor pathway
Ma, X., Choudhury, S. N., Xiang, H., Dai, Z., & Li, Y. (2013) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgt044 · Cited by 76
“199), which are comparable with Kras-induced lung tumorigenesis (25).”
BackgroundInfluentialYang, J., Lan, H., Huang, X., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042978 · Cited by 74
Bhandari, A., Gordon, W., Dizon, D., Hopkin, A. S., Gordon, E., Yu, Z., & D, B. A. M. (2012) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2012.168 · Cited by 74
Wagenaar, T. R., Zabludoff, S., Ahn, S., Allerson, C. R., Arlt, H., Baffa, R., Cao, H., Davis, S. P., Garcı́a-Echeverrı́a, C., Gaur, R., et al. (2015) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-14-0703 · Cited by 74
“Mice homozygous for miR-21 deletion are fertile and appear phenotypically normal, indicating that miR-21 is dispensable under normal physiologic conditions, yet plays a pivotal prosurvival function during cellular oncogenic transformation (11, 12).”
BackgroundNoncoding RNAs: New Players in Cancers
Chen, X., Fan, S., & Song, E. (2016) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1498-7_1 · Cited by 73
MicroRNA regulation of K-Ras in pancreatic cancer and opportunities for therapeutic intervention
Karmakar, S., Kaushik, G., Nimmakayala, R. K., Rachagani, S., Ponnusamy, M. P., & Batra, S. K. (2017) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.11.020 · Cited by 75
MicroRNA-21 and the clinical outcomes of various carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wang, W., Li, J., Zhu, W. J., Gao, C., Jiang, R., Li, W., Hu, Q., & Zhang, B. (2014) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-819 · Cited by 73
“cell-cycle control, development, apoptosis and tumour development [4,5].”
BackgroundA set of NF-κB–regulated microRNAs induces acquired TRAIL resistance in Lung cancer
Jeon, Y.-J., Middleton, J. D., Kim, T., Laganà, A., Piovan, C., Secchiero, P., Nuovo, G. J., Cui, R., Joshi, P., Romano, G., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1504630112 · Cited by 73
“Taken together, these data led us to conclude that NF-κB is the transcription factor responsible for miR21, miR-30c, and miR-100 transcriptional activation in NSCLC. Finally, because caspase-8 and TRAF-7 inhibit NF-κB activation and they are directly down-regulated by miR-21 and miR100, we questioned if miR-21 and miR…”
BackgroundInfluentialCrosstalk of MicroRNAs and Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Cancer
Lu, C., Zhou, D., Wang, Q., Liu, W., Yu, F., Wu, F., & Chen, C. (2020) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2020/2415324 · Cited by 73
Novel method to detect microRNAs using chip-based QuantStudio 3D digital PCR
Conte, D., Verri, C., Borzi, C., Suatoni, P., Pastorino, U., Sozzi, G., & Fortunato, O. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2097-9 · Cited by 74
“3a, we analyzed the expression of five miRNAs (mir-16-5p, mir-21-5p, mir-126-3p, mir-4865p and mir-660-5p) already demonstrated to have a role in lung cancer development [32, 38–41].”
Olejniczak, S. H., Rocca, G. L., Gruber, J. J., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1219958110 · Cited by 73
“PDCD4 is a robust miR-21 target known to regulate MAPK signaling via suppression of AP-1 activity (26, 27).”
BackgroundThe Therapeutic Potential of MicroRNAs: Disease Modulators and Drug Targets
McDermott, A. M., Heneghan, H., Miller, N., & Kerin, M. J. (2011) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-011-0550-2 · Cited by 74
“Using transgenic mice, Hatley et al. demonstrated that over-expression of miR-21 was associated with cell proliferation and tumor growth, whilst genetic deletion of miR-21 partially protected against tumor formation ( 68 ).”
BackgroundmiR-524-5p suppresses the growth of oncogenic BRAF melanoma by targeting BRAF and ERK2
Liu, S., Lu, J., Lee, H.-C., et al. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2452 · Cited by 72
“Moreover, miRNAs may act as oncomirs or as tumor suppressors, may be used in diagnostics or as prognostic biomarkers, and have been regarded as very promising therapeutic targets [5-7].”
BackgroundSareyeldin, R. M., Gupta, I., Al‐Hashimi, I., Al-Thawadi, H., Farsi, H. F. A., Vranić, S., & Moustafa, A. A. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11050646 · Cited by 76
“, provided further evidence that miR-21 targeted the RAS pathway and activated the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway [133].”
BackgroundKent, O. A., Mendell, J. T., & Rottapel, R. K. (2016) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-15-0456 · Cited by 71
“Recently, miR-21 has been found to be up regulated by oncogenic RAS through the MAPK pathway and the genetic deletion of miR-21 is able to suppress KRAS-driven tumors (13).”
BackgroundMicroRNA Expression Signatures in Solid Malignancies
Galasso, M., Sandhu, S. K., & Volinia, S. (2012) · The Cancer Journal · doi:10.1097/ppo.0b013e318258b5f4 · Cited by 71
Investigational agent MLN9708/2238 targets tumor-suppressor miR33b in MM cells
Tian, Z., Zhao, J.-J., Tai, Y.-T., Amin, S. B., Hu, Y., Berger, A. J., Richardson, P., Chauhan, D., & Anderson, K. C. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2012-01-401794 · Cited by 82
Li, X., Yu, Z., Li, Y., Liu, S., Gao, C., Hou, X., Yao, R., & Cui, L. (2014) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.2014.2786 · Cited by 70
McDonald, R. A., White, K. M., Wu, J., Cooley, B. C., Robertson, K. E., Halliday, C. A., McClure, J., Francis, S., Lu, R., Kennedy, S., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht105 · Cited by 70
“miR-21 knockout mice were previously described.(22,23) In vitro models”
The Fra-1/AP-1 Oncoprotein: From the “Undruggable” Transcription Factor to Therapeutic Targeting
Casalino, L., Talotta, F., Cimmino, A., & Verde, P. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14061480 · Cited by 67
MicroRNAs and Inflammation in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Colon Cancer
Okayama, H., Schetter, A. J., & Harris, C. C. (2012) · Digestive Diseases · doi:10.1159/000341882 · Cited by 67
RETRACTED: Role of miRNAs in lung cancer
Uddin, A., & Chakraborty, S. (2018) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.26607 · Cited by 69
RetractedEndocrine Disruptors Fludioxonil and Fenhexamid Stimulate miR-21 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells
Teng, Y., Manavalan, T. T., Hu, C., Medjakovic, S., Jungbauer, A., & Klinge, C. M. (2012) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfs290 · Cited by 69
Prognostic Value of miR-21 in Various Cancers: An Updating Meta-Analysis
Xin Min, Z. H. O. U., Wang, X., Huang, Z., Wang, J., Zhu, W., Shu, Y., & Liu, P. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102413 · Cited by 67
“Moreover the incidence of lung tumors is higher in miR-21 overexpression mice, while lower in miR-21 knockout mice [89].”
BackgroundMa, L. (2016) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/bs.acr.2016.07.004 · Cited by 69
The role of MAPK pathway in gastric cancer: unveiling molecular crosstalk and therapeutic prospects
Yuan, W., Shi, Y., Dai, S., Deng, M., Zhu, K., Xu, Y., Chen, Z., Zhou, X., Zhang, T., & Song, L. (2024) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-024-05998-8 · Cited by 68
“Contrary to miRNAs’ role as negative regulators, miR-21, a downstream miRNA effector, functions as an antagonist in the MAPK pathway by targeting multiple negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway, acting to block tumor suppressor genes [91].”
MYC Protein Inhibits Transcription of the MicroRNA Cluster MC-let-7a-1∼let-7d via Noncanonical E-box
Wang, Z., Lin, S., Li, J. J., Xu, Z., Yao, H., Zhu, X., Xie, D., Shen, Z., Sze, J., Li, K., et al. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.293126 · Cited by 69
Zhao, J., Fu, W., Liao, H.-Y., Dai, L., Jiang, Z., Pan, Y., Huang, H., Mo, Y., Li, S., Yang, G., et al. (2015) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1713-z · Cited by 65
“and a lot of miRNAs have been found can affect the development of cancer as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes depending on their targets [7–9].”
BackgroundSuppression of AKT expression by mi R ‐153 produced anti‐tumor activity in lung cancer
Yuan, Y., Du, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.29103 · Cited by 65
“miR-21 enhances tumor proliferation and survival by targeting antagonists of Ras/MEK/ERK signaling and pro-apoptotic genes.(6) miR-221&222 were shown to induce TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand resistance and enhance cellular migration by targeting PTEN and TIMP3 tumor suppressors.”
BackgroundPetrović, N. (2016) · Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40291-016-0186-3 · Cited by 66
“In vivo experiments reported that miR-21 was not included in the initial phases of cancerogenesis but was included in propagation [21, 58] and later events related to tumor progression [71].”
BackgroundExosomes and Exosomal MicroRNAs in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
Malla, B., Zaugg, K., Vassella, E., Aebersold, D. M., & Pra, A. D. (2017) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.031 · Cited by 68
Non-small-cell lung cancer and miRNAs: novel biomarkers and promising tools for treatment
Feng, B. C., Zhang, K., Wang, R., & Chen, L. (2015) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20140530 · Cited by 63
MicroRNAs as Molecular Targets for Cancer Therapy: On the Modulation of MicroRNA Expression
Costa, P. M., & de Lima, M. C. P. (2013) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph6101195 · Cited by 63
“manipulation of miR-21 and the targeted delivery of anti-miR-21 oligonucleotides were shown to slow down tumor progression in a Ras-driven murine model of lung cancer [102].”
MicroRNAs: Promising New Antiangiogenic Targets in Cancer
Gallach, S., Fariñas, S. C., Lewintre, E. J., & Camps, C. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/878450 · Cited by 64
MicroRNA regulation of macrophages in human pathologies
Wei, Y., & Schober, A. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2254-6 · Cited by 65
Li, C., Yin, Y., Liu, X., et al. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15596 · Cited by 63
“MiR-21 could promote tumorigenesis of NSCLC by potentiating indirectly the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway and inhibiting cell apoptosis [39].”
BackgroundHanna, J. A., Garcia, M. R., Lardennois, A., Leavey, P. J., Maglic, D., Fagnan, A., Go, J. C., Roach, J. T., Wang, Y., Finkelstein, D., et al. (2018) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-017-0081-3 · Cited by 61
Self-citationFrontiers of MicroRNA Signature in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Zhu, X., Kudo, M., Huang, X., Sui, H., Tian, H., Croce, C. M., & Cui, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.643942 · Cited by 62
“miR-21 promotes tumorigenesis through inhibition of negative regulators of the Ras/MEK/ERK signaling pathway (Hatley et al., 2010), suggesting that promising oncogenic functions of miR-21 in NSCLC.”
BackgroundMicroRNA-21 Controls Circadian Regulation of Apoptosis in Atherosclerotic Lesions
Schober, A., Blay, R. M., Maleki, S. S., Zahedi, F., Winklmaier, A. E., Kakar, M. Y., Baatsch, I. M., Zhu, M., Geißler, C., Fusco, A. E., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.051614 · Cited by 65
Joshi, P. (2014) · World Journal of Methodology · doi:10.5662/wjm.v4.i2.59 · Cited by 62
New Insights into the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Ding, Q., Luckhardt, T., Hecker, L., Zhou, Y., Liu, G., Antony, V. B., deAndrade, J. A., & Thannickal, V. J. (2011) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/11591490-000000000-00000 · Cited by 62
“miR-21 is one of the most studied miRNAs and has been shown to be involved in carcinogenesis, inflammation and cardiovascular diseases.([113-115]) miR-21 can activate the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) through targeting”
BackgroundAnimal Models to Study MicroRNA Function
Pal, A. S., & Kasinski, A. L. (2017) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/bs.acr.2017.06.006 · Cited by 64
Current Landscape of Epigenetics in Lung Cancer: Focus on the Mechanism and Application
Shi, Y.-X., Sheng, D., Cheng, L. Z., & Song, X.-Y. (2019) · Journal of Oncology · doi:10.1155/2019/8107318 · Cited by 64
“miR-21 overexpression accelerates tumorigenesis by targeting SPRY1, SPRY2, BTG2, and PDCD4, which act as negative regulators of the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway, and APAF-1, FASLG, PDCD4, and RHOB, which are involved in apoptosis [70].”
BackgroundMicroRNA-21 is immunosuppressive and pro-metastatic via separate mechanisms
Chi, L. H., Cross, R. S., Redvers, R. P., Davis, M. J., Hediyeh-zadeh, S., Mathivanan, S., Samuel, M., Lucas, E. C., Mouchemore, K. A., Gregory, P. A., et al. (2022) · Oncogenesis · doi:10.1038/s41389-022-00413-7 · Cited by 66
“Enhanced expression of miR-21 in the lungs of transgenic mice potentiated formation of non-small cell lung cancers driven by an activated K-Ras oncogene [31], while homozygous deletion of the miR-21 gene in mice reduced the incidence of lung tumours in the same K-Ras driven model [31].”
BackgroundNon‐coding RNAs as theranostics in human cancers
Redis, R. S., Berindan‐Neagoe, I., Pop, V. I., et al. (2011) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.24038 · Cited by 60
“In lung cancer, it was demonstrated that overexpression of miR-21 increased K-RAS tumorigenesis in vivo [Hatley et al., 2010a], while in glioblastoma, Chan et al. [2005] identified miR-21 as an anti-apoptotic factor.”
BackgroundGe, Y., Zhang, L., Nikolova, M., Reva, B. A., & Fuchs, E. V. (2015) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3275 · Cited by 62
Capodanno, A., Boldrini, L., Proietti, A., Alì, G., Pelliccioni, S., Niccoli, C., D’Incecco, A., Cappuzzo, F., Chella, A., Lucchi, M., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.2013.2003 · Cited by 59
MicroRNAs and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer
Sekhon, K., Bucay, N., Majid, S., Dahiya, R., & Saini, S. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.11708 · Cited by 61
“miR-21 has been reported to be Ras-induced, leading to tumor aggressiveness [107].”
BackgroundPotential of Exosomal microRNA-200b as Liquid Biopsy Marker in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Reese, M., Flammang, I., Yang, Z., & Dhayat, S. A. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12010197 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatley, M. E., Patrick, D. M., Garcia, M. R., Richardson, J. A., Bassel-Duby, R., van Rooij, E., & Olson, E. N.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Olson, Eric N.
- Venue
- Cancer Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 282-293
- ISSN
- 1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2971666
- OpenAlex
- W2169354377
- Semantic Scholar
- ea1aaa83b1883a1290ce31db3401b12568b668c7
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 63
- FWCI
- 16.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL093039)
- National Cancer Institute
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD000850)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Keywords
- miR-21, KRAS, lung carcinogenesis, non-small cell lung cancer, Ras/MEK/ERK pathway, apoptosis inhibition, transgenic mouse model, tumor suppressor microRNA
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mice, Nude, Mice, Transgenic, Genes, ras, Signal Transduction, MicroRNAs, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-21, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-21 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review