Cited by 237Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTactile and Sensory Interactions

Neuronal Plasticity: Beyond the Critical Period

Open access
Hübener, Mark, Bonhoeffer, Tobias·2014·Cell

Abstract

Neuronal plasticity in the brain is greatly enhanced during critical periods early in life and was long thought to be rather limited thereafter. Studies in primary sensory areas of the neocortex have revealed a substantial degree of plasticity in the mature brain, too. Often, plasticity in the adult neocortex lies dormant but can be reactivated by modifications of sensory input or sensory-motor interactions, which alter the level and pattern of activity in cortical circuits. Such interventions, potentially in combination with drugs targeting molecular brakes on plasticity present in the adult brain, might help recovery of function in the injured or diseased brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.035

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuronal circuits continue to exhibit robust plasticity well into adulthood.

    “Moreover, since neuronal circuits continue to exhibit robust plasticity -that is to say, remain able to reorganize in response to experience- well into adulthood 11,12 ,”
  • The brain seems to be particularly vulnerable to insults (genetic and environmental) around specific sensitive periods in which changes in brain structure have long-lasting impact over the lifespan.

    “Although development is a continuous process, the brain seems to be particularly vulnerable to insults (genetic and environmental) around specific sensitive periods in which changes in brain structure have long-lasting impact over the lifespan 11 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hübener, M., & Bonhoeffer, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Hübener, Mark
  • Bonhoeffer, Tobias
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
159
Issue
4
Pages
727-737
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982733111
Cited by
237
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 11
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
neuroplasticity, critical period, primary sensory cortex, sensory input, sensorimotor interaction, cortical circuits, brain injury recovery, neurorehabilitation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Critical Period, Psychological, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Species Specificity, Neocortex, Dominance, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review