Cited by 112Personality Traits and PsychologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

The five-factor model of personality and employees’ excessive use of technology

Buckner, John E., Castille, Christopher M., Sheets, Tilman L.·2012·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.014

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckner, J. E., Castille, C. M., & Sheets, T. L.
Affiliations
Louisiana Tech University (US)
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
1947-1953
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971233597
Cited by
112
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality traits, conscientiousness, technology overuse, problematic internet use, internet addiction, text messaging, workplace technology use, personnel selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review