Cited by 474Educational Games and GamificationDigital Games and MediaEmployee Performance and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment

Landers, Richard N., Bauer, Kristina N., Callan, Rachel C.·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 62 references

8 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–471 of 471

Metadata

Authors
Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Old Dominion University (US)
  • Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Landers, Richard N.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
71
Pages
508-515
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1741765804
Cited by
474
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 10
FWCI
47.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
gamification, leaderboards, goal setting theory, employee motivation, task performance, goal commitment, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review