Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 672

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users

Open access
Sjöblom, Max, Hamari, Juho·2017·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.019

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Cha, 2014, Usage of video sharing websites: Drivers and barriers, Telematics and Informatics, 31, 16, 10.1016/j.tele.2012.01.003 · DOI
  2. Chen, 2011, Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 755, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cook, 1979, Vol. 351
  4. Courtois, 2009, Gratifications and seeding behavior of online adolescents, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 109, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01496.x · DOI
  5. Hamari, 2017, What is eSports and why do people watch it?, Internet Research, 27, 10.1108/IntR-04-2016-0085 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hanson, 2008, YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A uses and gratifications approach, The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11, 10.3998/3336451.0011.305 · DOI
  7. Hernandez, 2011, The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools?, Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 2224, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.001 · DOI
  8. Ishii, 2006, Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life, Journal of Communication, 56, 346, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00023.x · DOI
  9. Jansz, 2005, Gaming at a LAN event: The social context of playing video games, New media & society, 7, 333, 10.1177/1461444805052280 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ko, 2005, Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising, Journal of Advertising, 34, 57, 10.1080/00913367.2005.10639191 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Krcmar, 1999, Predicting exposure to and uses of television violence, Journal of Communication, 49, 24, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02803.x · DOI
  12. Lange, 2007, Publicly private and privately Public: Social networking on YouTube, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 361, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00400.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. LaRose, 2004, A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 24, 358, 10.1207/s15506878jobem4803_2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lee, 2011, Comparison of eSports and traditional sports consumption motives, The ICHPER-SD Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance, 6, 39
  15. Lin, 2002, Perceived grati®cations of online media service use among potential users, Telematics and Informatics, 19, 3, 10.1016/S0736-5853(01)00014-4 · DOI
  16. Pai, 2013, User adoption of social networking sites: Eliciting uses and gratifications through a means–end approach, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1039, 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.025 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Quandt, 2015, Digital games research: A survey study on an emerging field and its prevalent debates, Journal of Communication, 10.1111/jcom.12182 · DOI
  18. Schmitt, 2003, Viewing the Viewers: Viewing behaviors by children and adults during television programs and commercials, Journal of Communication, 53, 265, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02590.x · DOI
  19. Vock, 2013, Understanding willingness to pay for social network sites, Journal of Service Research, 16, 311, 10.1177/1094670512472729 · DOI
  20. Wang, 2008, Loneliness, gender, and parasocial interaction: A uses and gratifications approach, Communication Quarterly, 56, 87, 10.1080/01463370701839057 · DOI
  21. Wang, 2012, The ‘‘Myth’’ of media Multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications, Journal of Communication, 62, 493, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Weiss, 2013, Virtual worlds in competitive contexts: Analyzing eSports consumer needs, Electronic Markets, 23, 307, 10.1007/s12525-013-0127-5 · DOI
  23. Wu, 2010, Falling in love with online games: The uses and gratifications perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1862, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.033 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 672

Metadata

Authors
Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
75
Pages
985-996
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.019
OpenAlex
W3123845465
Cited by
672
References
18
FWCI
102.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation (40009/16, 40111/14)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.