Cited by 63Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

PTSD's relation with problematic smartphone use: Mediating role of impulsivity

Open access
Contractor, Ateka A., Weiss, Nicole H., Tull, Matthew T., Elhai, Jon D.·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) frequently co-occurs with addictive behaviors. Recently, the addictive behavior of excessive smartphone use is being widely researched. Impulsivity commonly relates to PTSD severity and problematic smartphone use. However, unexamined is the mediating role of impulsivity facets (lack of premeditation, negative urgency, sensation seeking, and lack of perseverance) in the PTSD-problematic smartphone use relationship; this was the purpose of the current study. We used data collected from 346 participants recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform. PTSD severity, impulsivity facets, and problematic smartphone use were assessed using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale, and the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV), respectively. Negative urgency and lack of perseverance had significant positive correlations with both PTSD severity and problematic smartphone use. Results of mediation analyses indicated that negative urgency significantly mediated the relationship between PTSD severity and problematic smartphone use. Findings support the underlying role of negative urgency in the relation between PTSD severity and problematic smartphone use. Thus, treatments targeting negative urgency may potentially serve to reduce problematic smartphone use among individuals experiencing PTSD symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.018

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Contractor, A. A., Weiss, N. H., Tull, M. T., & Elhai, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Contractor, Ateka A.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
75
Pages
177-183
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613813794
Cited by
63
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10
FWCI
21.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K23DA039327, L30DA038349)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, smartphone addiction, impulsivity, negative urgency, lack of perseverance, sensation seeking, lack of premeditation, mediation, addictive behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review