Cited by 328Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week

Rozgonjuk, Dmitri, Levine, Jason C., Hall, Brian J., Elhai, Jon D.·2018·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.019

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rozgonjuk, D., Levine, J. C., Hall, B. J., & Elhai, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rozgonjuk, Dmitri
  • Hall, Brian J.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
87
Pages
10-17
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803663223
Cited by
327
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 5
FWCI
77.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
smartphone addiction, depression, anxiety, screen time, university students, latent growth curve models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review