Cited by 102Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionPersonality Traits and PsychologyImpact of Technology on Adolescents

‘I did it for the LULZ’: How the dark personality predicts online disinhibition and aggressive online behavior in adolescence

Open access
Kurek, Anna, Jose, Paul E., Stuart, Jaimee·2019·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.027

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anonymity feeds into the disinhibitory effect and is linked to increased cyberbullying perpetration.

    “Thus, anonymity feeds into the disinhibitory effect (32) and consistent with previous research is linked to increased cyberbullying perpetration (22, 33–36, 38, 106).”

    From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [33]

    In “Moral Disengagement and the Online Disinhibition Effect” (page unavailable), the paper identifies anonymity as a contributor to online disinhibition. “Predictors of Cyber Aggression” reports that disinhibition predicted greater cyber aggression, but the paper does not establish a separate link between anonymity and increased cyberbullying perpetration; its measured outcome is broader than cyberbullying. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Grothe, M., Staar, H., & Janneck, M. (2016, June). How to treat the troll? An empirical analysis of counterproductive online behavior, personality traits and organizational behavior. Paper presented at 11th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics, Dresden. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305208082_How_to_treat_the_t
  2. Joinson, A. N. (1998). Causes and effects of disinhibition on the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.) The psychology of the Internet (pp. 43-60). New York. Academic Press.
  3. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Camodeca, M. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 1-14. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.2011.02066.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurek, A., Jose, P. E., & Stuart, J.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kurek, Anna
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
98
Pages
31-40
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2923252112
Cited by
102
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Victoria University of Wellington
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
dark personality traits, online disinhibition effect, online aggression, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism, false self, adolescents, online behavior, antisocial personality, identity construction, online anonymity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review