Cited by 300Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingEmotions and Moral Behavior

How “dark” are the Dark Triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy

Rauthmann, John F., Kolar, Gerald P.·2012·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Fachhochschule für Management & Kommunikation (AT)
Corresponding author
Rauthmann, John F.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
884-889
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965237405
Cited by
300
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
Dark Triad, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, layperson perception, Dirty Dozen, desirability, self-other perspective

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review