Cited by 122Impact of Technology on AdolescentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMind wandering and attention

Anxious, bored, and (maybe) missing out: Evaluation of anxiety attachment, boredom proneness, and fear of missing out (FoMO)

Holte, Alex J., Ferraro, F. Richard·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106465

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holte, A. J., & Ferraro, F. R.
Affiliations
University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Holte, Alex J.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
112
Pages
106465
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038080641
Cited by
122
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
18.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
fear of missing out, boredom proneness, attachment anxiety, anxiety levels, depression severity, mediation, individual differences, social media use, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review