Cited by 71Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Concentrations and trends of perfluorinated chemicals in potential indoor sources from 2007 through 2011 in the US

Liu, Xiaoyu, Guo, Zhishi, Krebs, Kenneth A., Pope, Robert H., Roache, Nancy F.·2014·Chemosphere

Abstract

Certain perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) in consumer products used indoors are potential indoor PFCs sources and have been associated with developmental toxicity and other adverse health effects in laboratory animals (Lao et al., 2007). The concentrations of selected PFCs including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and other perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), in 35 selected consumer products that are commonly used in indoors were measured from the year of 2007 through 2011. The products collected included carpet, commercial carpet-care liquids, household carpet/fabric-care liquids, treated apparel, treated home textiles, treated non-woven medical garments, floor waxes, food-contact paper, membranes for apparel, and thread-sealant tapes. They were purchased from retail outlets in the United States between March 2007 and September 2011. The perfluorocarboxylic acid (PFCA) contents in the products have shown an overall downward trend. However, PFOA (C8) could still be detected in many products that we analyzed. Reductions of PFCAs were shown in both short-chain PFCAs (sum of C4 to C7) and long-chain PFCAs (sum of C8 to C12) over the study period. There were no significant changes observed between short-chain PFCAs and long-chain PFCAs. Fourteen products were analyzed to determine the amounts of perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFASs) they contained. These limited data show the pronounced increase of perfluoro-butane sulfonate (PFBS), an alternative to perfluorooctanoic sulfonate (PFOS), in the samples. A longer and wider range of study will be required to confirm this observed trend.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Guo, Z., Krebs, K. A., Pope, R. H., & Roache, N. F.
Affiliations
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • Arcadis (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Xiaoyu
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
98
Pages
51-57
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013931385
Cited by
71
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, PFBS, consumer goods, indoor sources, carpets, textiles, food contact paper, temporal trends, PFOS alternatives
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Alkanesulfonates, Caprylates, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, United States, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review