Cited by 276Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluorine in Organic ChemistryToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

A review of sources, multimedia distribution and health risks of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in China

Open access
Wang, Tieyu, Wang, Pei, Meng, Jing, Liu, Shijie, Lu, Yonglong, Khim, Jong Seong, Giesy, John P.·2015·Chemosphere

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) have been recognized as emerging pollutants because of their ubiquitous occurrence in the environment, biota and humans. In order to investigate their sources, fate and environmental effects, a great number of surveys have been carried out over the past several years. In the present review, we summarized the status of sources and emission, concentration, distribution and risks of PFAAs in China. Concentrations of PFAAs, especially perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in various environmental media including water, sediment, soil, rain, snow and organisms, as well as human tissues are summarized based on the available data. Concentrations of PFAAs in aquatic systems are higher in relatively more industrialized and urbanized areas than those from the less populated and remote regions in China, indicating that their emission and distribution are closely related to regional urbanization and industrialization. PFAAs and related products have been widely used over the past several decades, which have brought about high concentrations detected in environmental matrixes, biota and even local residents. Ecological risk assessment of PFAAs is still less developed in China. Most existing studies compared concentrations of PFAAs to guideline values derived for single species to evaluate the risk. In order to reveal the transport, partitioning and degradation of PFAAs in the environment, further studies on their behavior, fate, bioaccumulation and adverse effects in different trophic levels should be conducted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.021

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Wang, P., Meng, J., Liu, S., Lu, Y., Khim, J. S., & Giesy, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
129
Pages
87-99
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157024108
Cited by
276
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
perfluoroalkyl acids, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, emerging contaminants, environmental sources, emissions, environmental concentrations, aquatic ecosystems, sediment, soil, human tissue, environmental risk assessment, bioaccumulation, industrialization, urbanization, China
MeSH terms
Animals, China, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review