Cited by 1,738Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: Recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group

Open access

Abstract

The aging process is associated with gradual and progressive loss of muscle mass along with lowered strength and physical endurance. This condition, sarcopenia, has been widely observed with aging in sedentary adults. Regular aerobic and resistance exercise programs have been shown to counteract most aspects of sarcopenia. In addition, good nutrition, especially adequate protein and energy intake, can help limit and treat age-related declines in muscle mass, strength, and functional abilities. Protein nutrition in combination with exercise is considered optimal for maintaining muscle function. With the goal of providing recommendations for health care professionals to help older adults sustain muscle strength and function into older age, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) hosted a Workshop on Protein Requirements in the Elderly, held in Dubrovnik on November 24 and 25, 2013. Based on the evidence presented and discussed, the following recommendations are made (a) for healthy older people, the diet should provide at least 1.0-1.2 g protein/kg body weight/day, (b) for older people who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition because they have acute or chronic illness, the diet should provide 1.2-1.5 g protein/kg body weight/day, with even higher intake for individuals with severe illness or injury, and (c) daily physical activity or exercise (resistance training, aerobic exercise) should be undertaken by all older people, for as long as possible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.04.007

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 99 references

4 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,004

Metadata

Authors
Deutz, N. E. P., Bauer, J. M., Barazzoni, R., Biolo, G., Boirie, Y., Bosy-Westphal, A., Cederholm, T., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Krznariç, Z., Nair, K. S., Singer, P., Teta, D., Tipton, K., & Calder, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Deutz, Nicolaas E.P.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
929-936
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029230411
Cited by
1,738
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 211 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 195 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 159 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 8
FWCI
47.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000135)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL095903)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U24DK100469)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
protein intake, sarcopenia, aging, older adults, resistance training, aerobic exercise, muscle strength, muscle mass, malnutrition, protein requirements, energy intake
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Energy Intake, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Nutritional Requirements, Protein-Energy Malnutrition, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Sarcopenia, Recommended Dietary Allowances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review