The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning
Thompson, P. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022 · Cited by 557
Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review
Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027 · Cited by 440
Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers
Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.004 · Cited by 318
University students' self-regulated learning using digital technologies
Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0076-8 · Cited by 213
Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences
Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017 · Cited by 188
The five resources of critical digital literacy: a framework for curriculum integration
Hinrichsen, J., & Coombs, A. (2014) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v21.21334 · Cited by 169
Schmid, R., & Petko, D. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.006 · Cited by 144
Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014) · Scientific Study of Literature · doi:10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man · Cited by 141
Smith, K. T. (2019) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2017.1384043 · Cited by 115
Mäntymäki, M., & Riemer, K. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.010 · Cited by 112
Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.004 · Cited by 106
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.011 · Cited by 78
An embodied agent helps anxious students in mathematics learning
Kim, Y., Thayne, J., & Wei, Q. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9476-z · Cited by 70
Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study
Werang, B., & Radja Leba, S. M. (2022) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165 · Cited by 62
Patterson, M. C. (2017) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628316677913 · Cited by 55
Tsai, H.-Y. S., Rikard, R. V., Cotten, S. R., & Shillair, R. (2019) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2019.1690802 · Cited by 45
Schneider, B. C., Schröder, J., Berger, T., Hohagen, F., Meyer, B., Späth, C., Greiner, W., Hautzinger, M., Lutz, W., Rose, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.101 · Cited by 32
Analyzing Students’ Technology Use Motivations: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach
Guo, Z., Li, Y., & Stevens, K. J. (2012) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03014 · Cited by 32
Chen, P.-H., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.017 · Cited by 20
Exploring Digital Nativeness as a Predictor of Digital Game-Based L2 Vocabulary Acquisition
Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1548489 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 722-732
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964420753
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 147.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.