Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,621

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?

Ng, Wan·2012·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Becker, H. J. (2000, January). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: is Larry Cuban right? Revision of a paper written for the School Technology Leadership Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, D.C. Retrieved 15.07.11 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ccsso.pdf.
  2. Kozma, 2003, Global perspectives: innovative technology integration practices from around the world, Learning & Leading with Technology, 31, 6
  3. Martin, 2005, DigEuLit – a European framework for digital literacy: a progress report, Journal of ELiteracy, 2, 130
  4. Ng, 2003, Science and computer-based technologies in Victorian Government schools: attitudes of secondary science teachers, Journal of Research in Science and Technology Education, 21, 243, 10.1080/0263514032000127266 · doi:10.1080/0263514032000127266

Cited by

See all 1,621

Metadata

Authors
Ng, W.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
1065-1078
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
OpenAlex
W2082581342
Cited by
1,621
References
29
FWCI
76.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.