The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: Findings from two experiment studies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the studies by de-Marcos et al. (2014) and Su and Cheng (2014) plus the first of two studies reported by Hew et al. (2016) were excluded from the analysis because they reported the same experiments as previously published or more extensive studies included in this sample.”
From The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Hew et al. (2016)
In the citing paper
“Finally, studies have reported a positive effect of game mechanics on the motivation of students to become engaged in their tasks (Hew, Huang, Chu & Chiu 2016;Huang et al. 2018).”
From Towards a motivational design? Connecting gamification user types and online learning activities (2020) · cites this paper as Hew, Huang, Chu & Chiu 2016
Citations
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
(2001) · Cited by 13,930
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Kilzer, E., & Skinner, B. F. (1953) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707860 · Cited by 8,940
From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments · doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040 · Cited by 8,402
What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy
(2004) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et.2004.00446dae.002 · Cited by 6,674
Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014) · 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.377 · Cited by 5,201
Halford, G. S., & Andrews, G. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658 · Cited by 4,912
Handbook of Self-Determination Research
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004) · Cited by 4,528
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 · Cited by 3,050
Motivations for Play in Online Games
Yee, N. (2006) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 · Cited by 2,939
Tatnall, A. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_300187 · Cited by 2,893
Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance.
Furrer, C. J., & Skinner, E. A. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148 · Cited by 2,730
Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps
Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. J. L. (2011) · Cited by 2,378
Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes
Domínguez‐Díaz, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de‐Marcos, L., Sanz, L. F., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020 · Cited by 2,189
Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012840 · Cited by 2,037
Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20303 · Cited by 1,956
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019 · Cited by 1,918 · cited 4×
“…paper, we reviewed additional empirical studies not covered by Hamari et al. (2014) (i.e., Abramovich, Schunn, & Higashi, 2013; Attali & Arieli-Attali, 2015; Coetzee, Fox, Hearst, & Hartmann, 2014; Davis & Singh, 2015; Hanus & Fox, 2015; Ibanez et al., 2014; Mekler, Brühlmann, Opwis, & Tuch, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDevelopment of Achievement Motivation
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0315 · Cited by 1,874
Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002 · Cited by 1,858
(2015) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 1,551
Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches
Jones, A. C. (2000) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(00)00011-7 · Cited by 1,511
Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2 · Cited by 1,378
From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification”
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. E. (2011) · IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) · Cited by 1,341
Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother?
Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011) · Academic exchange quarterly · Cited by 1,199
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
Social Comparison: Why, With Whom, and With What Effect?
Suls, J. M., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. S. (2002) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00191 · Cited by 1,014
Suls, J. M., & Wheeler, L. S. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7 · Cited by 825
Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003) · The California School Psychologist · doi:10.1007/bf03340893 · Cited by 811
Filho, W. L. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_300076 · Cited by 658
Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
(2024) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2024.000 · Cited by 649
(2009) · Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University) · Cited by 599
What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3564 · Cited by 575
Are badges useful in education?: it depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner
Abramovich, S., Schunn, C. D., & Higashi, R. M. (2013) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2 · Cited by 554
Gamification for Engaging Computer Science Students in Learning Activities: A Case Study
Ibanez, M.-B., Serio, Á. D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2014.2329293 · Cited by 507
The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement
Denny, P. C. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2470763 · Cited by 500
Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance?
Attali, Y., & Arieli‐Attali, M. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012 · Cited by 463
van der Veer, R. (1998) · Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6696(199823)34:4 · Cited by 425
The Gamification of Learning and Instruction Fieldbook: Ideas into Practice
Kapp, K. M. (2013) · Cited by 419
A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Computer Games as Learning Tools
Ke, F. (2009) · Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education · doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch001 · Cited by 362
Jung, J. H., Schneider, C., & Valacich, J. S. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1129 · Cited by 357
Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A. N. (2013) · Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications · doi:10.1145/2583008.2583017 · Cited by 314
Christy, K. R., & Fox, J. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.005 · Cited by 276
Empirical Study on the Effect of Achievement Badges in TRAKLA2 Online Learning Environment
Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013) · doi:10.1109/latice.2013.34 · Cited by 228
Li, W., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. W. (2012) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/2380116.2380131 · Cited by 223
What Student Engagement Data Tell Us about College Readiness
Kuh, G. D. (2007) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · Cited by 188
Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system?
Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M. A., & Hartmann, B. (2014) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2531602.2531657 · Cited by 182
Collins, R. L. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_9 · Cited by 173
Vasalampi, K., Salmela‐Aro, K., & Nurmi, J. (2009) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.14.4.332 · Cited by 162
Lugmayr, A. R., Franssila, H., Sotamaa, O., Safran, C., & Aaltonen, T. (2010) · Cited by 151
Davis, K. S., & Singh, S. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.011 · Cited by 135
Leveraging gamification in demand dispatch systems
Gnauk, B., Dannecker, L., & Hahmann, M. (2012) · EDBT/ICDT Workshops · doi:10.1145/2320765.2320799 · Cited by 114
The Gamification of Learning and Instruction Fieldbook
Kapp, K. M., Blair, L., & Mesch, R. (2014) · Cited by 79
Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A. N. (2013) · edoc (University of Basel) · doi:10.5451/unibas-ep32047 · Cited by 63
Heeter, C., Lee, Y.-H., Medler, B., & Magerko, B. S. (2011) · ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (Sandbox) · doi:10.1145/2018556.2018565 · Cited by 47
A Structural Equation Modelling Approach for Massive Blended Synchronous Teacher Training.
Kannan, K. P., & Narayanan, K. (2015) · DSpace (IIT Bombay) · Cited by 34
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games
Taylor, T. L. (2011) · doi:10.1145/2018556 · Cited by 9
Atnip, B. R. K. (2015) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bartle, 1996, Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs, Journal of MUD Research, 1, 1
- Bhattacharyya, 2010, Individuality as a negative characteristic in students to carry out teamwork and the challenges for a soft skills trainer to groom management students – a critical review, Asian Journal of Management Research, 566
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w · Cited by 2,594
Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5 · Cited by 2,112
“…and levels increase performance, competence, need satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation (Mekler et al., 2015), on involving Asian students in gamified course activities (Hew et al., 2016) and on the predictive effect of gaming personality on their game dynamic preferences (Tu et al., 2015).”
InfluentialGamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature
Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.028 · Cited by 1,043
Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322 · Cited by 994
Self-citationLo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2 · Cited by 871
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hew, K. F., Huang, B., Chu, K. W. S., & Chiu, D. K. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Hew, Khe Foon
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 92-93
- Pages
- 221-236
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2172909550
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 45.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Keywords
- game mechanics, student engagement, points, badges, and leaderboards, self-determination theory, student motivation, knowledge recall, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review