Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 562

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The hazards of time

Nobre, AC, Correa, A, Coull, JT·2007·Current Opinion in Neurobiology
DOI 10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.006

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Gallistel, 2000, Time, rate, and conditioning, Psychol Rev, 107, 289, 10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.289 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.289 · Paper page
  2. Woodrow, 1914, The measurement of attention, Psychol Monogr, 17, 1, 10.1037/h0093087 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Niemi, 1981, Foreperiod and simple reaction time, Psychol Bull, 89, 133, 10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.133 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barnes, 1991, The mechanism of prediction in human smooth pursuit eye movements, J Physiol, 439, 439, 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018675 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barnes, 2005, Predicting the duration of ocular pursuit in humans, Exp Brain Res, 160, 10, 10.1007/s00221-004-1981-3 · DOI
  6. Medina, 2005, The representation of time for motor learning, Neuron, 45, 157, 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.017 · DOI
  7. Kingstone, 1993, What are human express saccades?, Percept Psychophys, 54, 260, 10.3758/BF03211762 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Reuter-Lorenz, 1995, Effects of warning signals and fixation point offsets on the latencies of pro-versus antisaccades: implications for an interpretation of the gap effect, Exp Brain Res, 103, 287, 10.1007/BF00231715 · DOI
  9. Lasley, 1981, Detection of luminance increment: effect of temporal uncertainty, J Opt Soc Am, 71, 845, 10.1364/JOSA.71.000845 · DOI
  10. Westheimer, 1996, Temporal uncertainty effects on orientation discrimination and stereoscopic thresholds, J Opt Soc Am, 13, 884, 10.1364/JOSAA.13.000884 · doi:10.1364/josaa.13.000884
  11. Rolke, 2007, Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 522, 10.3758/BF03194101 · DOI
  12. Jones, 2002, Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays, Psychol Sci, 13, 313, 10.1111/1467-9280.00458 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Guo, 2004, Effects on orientation perception of manipulating the spatio-temporal prior probability of stimuli, Vis Res, 44, 2349, 10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.014 · DOI
  14. Praamstra, 2006, Neurophysiology of implicit timing in serial choice reaction-time performance, J Neurosci, 26, 5448, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0440-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Barnes, 2000, Expectancy, attention, and time, Cogn Psychol, 41, 254, 10.1006/cogp.2000.0738 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ghose, 2006, Strategies optimize the detection of motion transients, J Vis, 6, 429, 10.1167/6.4.10 · DOI
  17. Olson, 2001, Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention, J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 27, 1299, 10.1037/0278-7393.27.5.1299 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.5.1299
  18. Coull, 1998, Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI, J Neurosci, 18, 7426, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-18-07426.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Miniussi, 1999, Orienting attention in time: modulation of brain potentials, Brain, 122, 1507, 10.1093/brain/122.8.1507 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Griffin, 2001, Orienting attention in time, Front Biosci, 6, 660, 10.2741/Griffin · DOI
  21. Correa, 2004, Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks, Percept Psychophys, 66, 264, 10.3758/BF03194878 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lange, 2006, Attending points in time and space, Exp Brain Res, 173, 130, 10.1007/s00221-006-0372-3 · DOI
  23. Lange, 2006, Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities, J Cogn Neurosci, 18, 715, 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.715 · DOI
  24. Lange, 2003, Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: an event-related potential study, Psychophysiology, 40, 806, 10.1111/1469-8986.00081 · DOI
  25. Correa, 2006, The attentional mechanism of temporal orienting: determinants and attributes, Exp Brain Res, 169, 58, 10.1007/s00221-005-0131-x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Los, 2005, Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation, Percept Psychophys, 67, 1161, 10.3758/BF03193549 · DOI
  27. Los, 2001, Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 27, 370, 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.370 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Griffin, 2002, Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time, Neuropsychologia, 40, 2325, 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00087-8 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Correa, 2005, Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual-level, Psychon Bull Rev, 12, 328, 10.3758/BF03196380 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Martens, 2005, Timing attention: cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink, Mem Cogn, 33, 234, 10.3758/BF03195312 · DOI
  31. Fabre, 2006, Attentional modulation of masked repetition and categorical priming in young and older adults, Cognition
  32. Kiefer, 2006, Attentional modulation of unconscious “automatic” processes: evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm, J Cogn Neurosci, 18, 184, 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.184 · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.184 · Paper page
  33. Riehle, 1997, Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function, Science, 278, 1950, 10.1126/science.278.5345.1950 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Renoult, 2006, Time is a rubber band: neuronal activity in monkey motor cortex in relation to time estimation, Eur J Neurosci, 23, 3098, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04824.x · DOI
  35. Lucchetti, 2001, Time-modulated neuronal activity in the premotor cortex of macaque monkeys, Exp Brain Res, 141, 254, 10.1007/s002210100818 · DOI
  36. Heinen, 1997, Single-neuron activity in the dorsomedial frontal cortex during smooth-pursuit eye movements to predictable target motion, Visual Neurosci, 14, 853, 10.1017/S0952523800011597 · DOI
  37. Leon, 2003, Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque, Neuron, 38, 317, 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00185-5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Rektor, 2002, Scalp-recorded Bereitschaftspotential is the result of the activity of cortical and subcortical generators—a hypothesis, Clin Neurophysiol, 113, 1998, 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00286-9 · DOI
  39. Walter, 1964, Contingent negative variation: an electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain, Nature, 203, 380, 10.1038/203380a0 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Macar, 2004, Event-related potentials as indices of time processing: a review, J Psychophysiol, 18, 89, 10.1027/0269-8803.18.23.89 · DOI
  41. Pfeuty, 2005, Relationship between CNV and timing of an upcoming event, Neurosci Lett, 382, 106, 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.02.067 · DOI
  42. Trillenberg, 2000, CNV and temporal uncertainty with ‘ageing’ and ‘non-ageing’ S1–S2 intervals, Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 1216, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00274-1 · DOI
  43. Los, 2005, Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation: electrophysiological evidence, J Exp Psychol: Gen, 134, 52, 10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.52 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Muller-Gethmann, 2003, Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential, Psychophysiology, 40, 597, 10.1111/1469-8986.00061 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Hackley, 2007, Localization of temporal preparation effects via trisected reaction time, Psychophysiology, 44, 334, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00500.x · DOI
  46. Correa, 2006, Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials, Brain Res, 1076, 116, 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.074 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Sakai, 2000, What and when: parallel and convergent processing in motor control, J Neurosci, 20, 2691, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-07-02691.2000 · DOI
  48. Schubotz, 2003, Auditory what, where, and when: a sensory somatotopy in lateral premotor cortex, Neuroimage, 20, 173, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00218-0 · DOI
  49. Coull, 2000, Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts, Neuropsychologia, 38, 808, 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00132-3 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Vallesi, 2007, The neural basis of temporal preparation: insights from brain tumor patients, Neuropsychologia, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.017 · DOI
  51. Stuss, 2005, Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed, Neuropsychologia, 43, 396, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Ghose, 2002, Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing, Nature, 419, 616, 10.1038/nature01057 · DOI · Paper page
  53. McCormick, 1984, Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response, Science, 223, 296, 10.1126/science.6701513 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Hollerman, 1998, Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of reward during learning, Nat Neurosci, 1, 304, 10.1038/1124 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Kalenscher, 2006, The neuroscience of impulsive and self-controlled decisions, Int J Psychophysiol, 62, 203, 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.05.010 · DOI
  56. Tsujimoto, 2005, Neuronal activity representing temporal prediction of reward in the primate prefrontal cortex, J Neurophysiol, 93, 3687, 10.1152/jn.01149.2004 · DOI
  57. Roesch, 2005, Neuronal activity dependent on anticipated and elapsed delay in macaque prefrontal cortex, frontal and supplementary eye fields, and premotor cortex, J Neurophysiol, 94, 1469, 10.1152/jn.00064.2005 · DOI
  58. Shuler, 2006, Reward timing in the primary visual cortex, Science, 311, 1606, 10.1126/science.1123513 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Buhusi, 2005, What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing, Nat Rev Neurosci, 6, 755, 10.1038/nrn1764 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Mauk, 2004, The neural basis of temporal processing, Annu Rev Neurosci, 27, 307, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144247 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Treisman, 1963, Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: implications for a model of the internal clock, Psychol. Monogr., 77, 1, 10.1037/h0093864 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Nobre, 2004, Time is of the essence, Trends Cogn Sci, 8, 387, 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.005 · DOI
  63. Malapani, 1998, Coupled temporal memories in Parkinson's disease: a dopamine-related dysfunction, J Cogn Neurosci, 10, 316, 10.1162/089892998562762 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Gibbon, 1997, Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 7, 170, 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80005-0 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Ivry, 2004, The neural representation of time, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 14, 225, 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Koch, 2007, Repetitive TMS of cerebellum interferes with millisecond time processing, Exp Brain Res, 179, 291, 10.1007/s00221-006-0791-1 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Lee, 2007, The role of the cerebellum in subsecond time perception: evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, J Cogn Neurosci, 19, 147, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.147 · DOI
  68. Jones, 2004, The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is essential in time reproduction: an investigation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, Exp Brain Res, 158, 366, 10.1007/s00221-004-1912-3 · DOI
  69. Rao, 2001, The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing, Nat Neurosci, 4, 317, 10.1038/85191 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Morrone, 2005, Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space, Nat Neurosci, 8, 950, 10.1038/nn1488 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Johnston, 2006, Spatially localized distortions of event time, Curr Biol, 16, 472, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.032 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Burr, 2007, Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates, Nat Neurosci, 10, 423, 10.1038/nn1874 · doi:10.1038/nn1874
  73. Gross, 2006, Anticipatory control of long-range phase synchronization, Eur J Neurosci, 24, 2057, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05082.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 562

Metadata

Authors
Nobre, A., Correa, A., & Coull, J.
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
465-470
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.006
OpenAlex
W2044179284
Cited by
562
References
10
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The hazards of time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.006
The paper
Nobre, A., Correa, A., & Coull, J. (2007). The hazards of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.