CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Boundaries of the relation between conscious recollection and source memory for perceptual details

Meiser, Thorsten, Sattler, Christine·2007·Consciousness and Cognition
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2006.04.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The relation between conscious recollection and source memory for perceptual details was investigated in three experiments that combined the remember-know paradigm with a multidimensional source monitoring test. Experiment 1 replicated that source memory for perceptual details is better in the case of "remember" than "know" judgments. Experiment 2 showed that the relation between "remember" judgments and source memory for perceptual details is diminished by a semantic orienting task during encoding. Experiment 3 demonstrated that "remember" judgments are related to enhanced source memory for specific and unique kinds of perceptual source information, whereas memory for incomplete and global perceptual source information does not differentiate between "remember" and "know" judgments. The results show that the attentional focus during encoding and the specificity of retrieved source information form boundary conditions for the use of source memory for perceptual details as a basis of "remember" judgments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2006.04.003

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even in humans the connection between source memory for perceptual details and conscious recall is not necessarily universal and clear-cut.

    “even in humans the connection between source memory for perceptual details and conscious recall (i.e. ‘remember’ judgements) is not necessarily universal and clear-cut [183].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [183]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Meiser, T., & Sattler, C.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Meiser, Thorsten
ORCID
Meiser, Thorsten
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
189-210
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.concog.2006.04.003
OpenAlex
W2009420462
Cited by
40
References
55
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
conscious recollection, source memory, perceptual detail, remember-know judgments, source monitoring, attentional focus, encoding specificity, memory specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Consciousness, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Memory, Mental Recall, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review