Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-cell gene expression profiling and cell state dynamics: collecting data, correlating data points and connecting the dots

Marr, Carsten, Zhou, Joseph X, Huang, Sui·2016·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Published version of a preprint

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.04.015

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Coutu, 2013, Probing cellular processes by long-term live imaging—historic problems and current solutions, J Cell Sci, 126, 3805
  2. de Vargas Roditi, 2015, Computational and experimental single cell biology techniques for the definition of cell type heterogeneity, interplay and intracellular dynamics, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 34, 9, 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.10.010 · DOI
  3. Trapnell, 2015, Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics, Genome Res, 25, 1491, 10.1101/gr.190595.115 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chambers, 2007, Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development, Nature, 450, 1230, 10.1038/nature06403 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chang, 2008, Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells, Nature, 453, 544, 10.1038/nature06965 · DOI
  6. Krishnaswamy, 2014, Systems biology. Conditional density-based analysis of T cell signaling in single-cell data, Science, 346, 1250689, 10.1126/science.1250689 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Zunder, 2015, A continuous molecular roadmap to iPSC reprogramming through progression analysis of single-cell mass cytometry, Cell Stem Cell, 16, 323, 10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.015 · DOI
  8. Lujan, 2015, Early reprogramming regulators identified by prospective isolation and mass cytometry, Nature, 521, 352, 10.1038/nature14274 · DOI
  9. Junker, 2014, Every cell is special: genome-wide studies add a new dimension to single-cell biology, Cell, 157, 8, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.010 · DOI
  10. Sandberg, 2014, Entering the era of single-cell transcriptomics in biology and medicine, Nat Methods, 11, 22, 10.1038/nmeth.2764 · DOI
  11. Macosko, 2015, Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets, Cell, 161, 1202, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Klein, 2015, Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells, Cell, 161, 1187, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Smallwood, 2014, Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity, Nat Methods, 11, 817, 10.1038/nmeth.3035 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lubeck, 2014, Single-cell in situ RNA profiling by sequential hybridization, Nat Methods, 11, 360, 10.1038/nmeth.2892 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Giesen, 2014, Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry, Nat Methods, 11, 417, 10.1038/nmeth.2869 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Buettner, 2014, Probabilistic PCA of censored data: accounting for uncertainties in the visualization of high-throughput single-cell qPCR data, Bioinformatics, 30, 1867, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu134 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Pierson, 2015, ZIFA: dimensionality reduction for zero-inflated single-cell gene expression analysis, Genome Biol, 16, 241, 10.1186/s13059-015-0805-z · DOI · Paper page
  18. Van der Maaten, 2008, Visualizing data using t-SNE, J Mach Learn Res, 9, 85
  19. Buettner, 2012, A novel approach for resolving differences in single-cell gene expression patterns from zygote to blastocyst, Bioinformatics, 28, i626, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts385 · DOI
  20. Haghverdi, 2015, Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data, Bioinformatics, 31, 2989, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv325 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Angerer, 2016, Destiny—diffusion maps for large-scale single-cell data in R, Bioinformatics, 32, 1241, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv715 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Zare, 2010, Data reduction for spectral clustering to analyze high throughput flow cytometry data, BMC Bioinform, 11, 403, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-403 · DOI
  23. Malek, 2015, flowDensity: reproducing manual gating of flow cytometry data by automated density-based cell population identification, Bioinformatics, 31, 606, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu677 · DOI
  24. Bruggner, 2014, Automated identification of stratifying signatures in cellular subpopulations, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111, E2770, 10.1073/pnas.1408792111 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Levine, 2015, Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis, Cell, 162, 184, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.047 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Zeisel, 2015, Brain structure. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq, Science, 347, 1138, 10.1126/science.aaa1934 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Trapnell, 2014, The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells, Nat Biotechnol, 32, 381, 10.1038/nbt.2859 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Leng, 2015, Oscope identifies oscillatory genes in unsynchronized single-cell RNA-seq experiments [Internet], Nat Methods, 10.1038/nmeth.3549 · DOI
  29. Pisco, 2013, Non-Darwinian dynamics in therapy-induced cancer drug resistance, Nat Commun, 4, 2467, 10.1038/ncomms3467 · DOI
  30. Hoppe, 2014, Single-cell technologies sharpen up mammalian stem cell research, Nat Cell Biol, 16, 919, 10.1038/ncb3042 · DOI
  31. Singer, 2014, Dynamic heterogeneity and DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells, Mol Cell, 55, 319, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.029 · DOI
  32. Ochiai, 2014, Stochastic promoter activation affects Nanog expression variability in mouse embryonic stem cells, Sci Rep, 4, 7125, 10.1038/srep07125 · DOI
  33. Abranches, 2014, Stochastic NANOG fluctuations allow mouse embryonic stem cells to explore pluripotency, Development, 141, 2770, 10.1242/dev.108910 · DOI
  34. Cannon, 2015, Multiple cell and population-level interactions with mouse embryonic stem cell heterogeneity, Development, 142, 2840
  35. Filipczyk, 2015, Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells [Internet], Nat Cell Biol, 10.1038/ncb3237 · DOI
  36. Bertrand, 1998, Localization of ASH1 mRNA particles in living yeast, Mol Cell, 2, 437, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80143-4 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Huang, 2011, Systems biology of stem cells: three useful perspectives to help overcome the paradigm of linear pathways, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 366, 2247, 10.1098/rstb.2011.0008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Kauffman, 1969, Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets, J Theor Biol, 22, 437, 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90015-0 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Huang, 2010, Cell lineage determination in state space: a systems view brings flexibility to dogmatic canonical rules, PLoS Biol, 8, e1000380, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000380 · DOI
  40. Zhou, 2012, Quasi-potential landscape in complex multi-stable systems, J R Soc Interface, 9, 3539, 10.1098/rsif.2012.0434 · DOI
  41. Huang, 2009, Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise, Development, 136, 3853, 10.1242/dev.035139 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Huang, 2012, The molecular and mathematical basis of Waddington's epigenetic landscape: a framework for post-Darwinian biology?, Bioessays, 34, 149, 10.1002/bies.201100031 · DOI
  43. Mojtahedi M, Skupin A, Zhou JX, Castano IG, Leong-Quong R, Chang H, Giuliani A, Huang S: Binary cell fate-decision as high-dimensional critical state transition [Internet], bioRxiv 2016. · DOI
  44. Wang, 2010, The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation, Biophys J, 99, 29, 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.03.058 · DOI
  45. Zhou, 2011, Predicting pancreas cell fate decisions and reprogramming with a hierarchical multi-attractor model, PLoS ONE, 6, e14752, 10.1371/journal.pone.0014752 · DOI
  46. Wang, 2011, Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108, 8257, 10.1073/pnas.1017017108 · DOI
  47. Sisan, 2012, Predicting rates of cell state change caused by stochastic fluctuations using a data-driven landscape model, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 19262, 10.1073/pnas.1207544109 · DOI
  48. Marco, 2014, Bifurcation analysis of single-cell gene expression data reveals epigenetic landscape, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111, E5643, 10.1073/pnas.1408993111 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Tyson, 2012, Fractional proliferation: a method to deconvolve cell population dynamics from single-cell data, Nat Methods, 9, 923, 10.1038/nmeth.2138 · DOI
  50. Qian, 2012, Cooperativity in cellular biochemical processes: noise-enhanced sensitivity, fluctuating enzyme, bistability with nonlinear feedback, and other mechanisms for sigmoidal responses, Annu Rev Biophys, 41, 179, 10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102240 · DOI

Cited by

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Marr, C., Zhou, J. X., & Huang, S.
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
39
Pages
207-214
ISSN
0958-1669
Cited by
35
References
19
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • German Science Foundation DFG
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM987654)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single-cell gene expression profiling and cell state dynamics: collecting data, correlating data points and connecting the dots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.04.015
The paper
Marr, C., Zhou, J. X., & Huang, S. (2016). Single-cell gene expression profiling and cell state dynamics: collecting data, correlating data points and connecting the dots. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.04.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.