Cited by 512Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation and Cyber Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior

Gerber, Nina, Gerber, Paul, Volkamer, Melanie·2018·Computers & Security

DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 · Cited by 37,615
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Untitled work
(2004) · Cited by 5,198
The Affect Heuristic
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013
The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors
NORBERG, P. A., HORNE, D. R., & HORNE, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x · Cited by 1,526
Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195 · Cited by 1,412
An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory
Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (1998) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00021-7 · Cited by 1,353
The psychology of judgment and decision making
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-2965 · Cited by 1,255
Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon
Kokolakis, S. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002 · Cited by 1,229
Privacy and rationality in individual decision making
Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005) · IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2005.22 · Cited by 1,123
The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online
Bansal, G., Zahedi, F. “., & Gefen, D. (2010) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010 · Cited by 958
The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing
Xu, H., Luo, X. (., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017 · Cited by 708
The ‘Privacy Paradox’ in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure
Taddicken, M. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12052 · Cited by 666
Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550612455931 · Cited by 522
Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context
Miltgen, C. L., Popovič, A., & Oliveira, T. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010 · Cited by 460
Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors
Dienlin, T., & Trepte, S. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2049 · Cited by 453
The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors
Li, H. Z., Sarathy, R., & Xu, H. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.01.017 · Cited by 426
Research Note —Effects of Individual Self-Protection, Industry Self-Regulation, and Government Regulation on Privacy Concerns: A Study of Location-Based Services
Xu, H., Teo, H., Tan, B. C. Y., & Agarwal, R. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0416 · Cited by 359
Information disclosure on mobile devices: Re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior
Keith, M. J., Thompson, S. C., Hale, J., Lowry, P. B., & Greer, C. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.08.016 · Cited by 337
Why do people play social network games?
Shin, D., & Shin, Y.-J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.010 · Cited by 267
Examining the impact of privacy, trust and risk perceptions beyond monetary transactions: An integrated model
Liao, C., Liu, C., & Chen, K. (2011) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2011.07.003 · Cited by 228
Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: Testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience
Cho, H., Lee, J., & Chung, S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.012 · Cited by 217
The impact of disposition to privacy, website reputation and website familiarity on information privacy concerns
Li, Y. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.018 · Cited by 205
What Can Behavioral Economics Teach Us about Privacy?
Grossklags, J., & Acquisti, A. (2007) · Auerbach Publications eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420052183-29 · Cited by 203
The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms
Utz, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2009) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · Cited by 201
Personalisation–privacy paradox: The effects of personalisation and privacy assurance on customer responses to travel Web sites
Lee, C.-H., & Cranage, D. A. (2010) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.011 · Cited by 199
Factors affecting privacy disclosure on social network sites: an integrated model
Xu, F., Michael, K., & Chen, X. (2013) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-013-9111-6 · Cited by 198
Variables influencing information security policy compliance
Sommestad, T., Hallberg, J., Lundholm, K., & Bengtsson, J. (2014) · Information Management & Computer Security · doi:10.1108/imcs-08-2012-0045 · Cited by 197
The influence of user affect in online information disclosure
Wakefield, R. (2013) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.01.003 · Cited by 172
Teens’ concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors
Feng, Y., & Xie, W. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.009 · Cited by 156
Exploring information privacy regulation, risks, trust, and behavior
Miltgen, C. L., & Smith, H. J. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.06.006 · Cited by 139
What matters to users?
Leon, P. G., Ur, B., Wang, Y., Sleeper, M., Balebako, R., Shay, R., Bauer, L., Christodorescu, M., & Cranor, L. F. (2013) · Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2501604.2501611 · Cited by 137
Dimensionality of information disclosure behavior
Knijnenburg, B. P., Kobsa, A., & Jin, H. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.06.003 · Cited by 135
"Preventative" vs. "Reactive"
Wiśniewski, P., Jia, H., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675293 · Cited by 119
Successful Failure: What Foucault Can Teach Us About Privacy Self-Management in a World of Facebook and Big Data
Hull, G. (2014) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-015-9363-z · Cited by 119
My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: Why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns
Baek, Y. M., Kim, E., & Bae, Y. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.010 · Cited by 113
Social scientists’ data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories
Kim, Y., & Adler, M. A. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.007 · Cited by 112
See you, see me: teenagers’ self-disclosure and regret of posting on social network site.
Xie, W., & Kang, C. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.059 · Cited by 104
An empirical analysis of users’ privacy disclosure behaviors on social network sites
Li, K., Lin, Z., & Wang, X. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.07.006 · Cited by 96
I trust not therefore it must be risky: Determinants of the perceived risks of disclosing personal data for e-government transactions
Beldad, A. D., de Jong, M. D. T., & Steehouder, M. F. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.002 · Cited by 93
Do men and women differ in privacy? Gendered privacy and (in)equality in the Internet
Park, Y. J. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.011 · Cited by 92
Solving the privacy paradox: A counter-argument experimental approach
Baek, Y. M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.006 · Cited by 88
A model of consumers’ perceptions of the invasion of information privacy
Schwaig, K. S., Segars, A. H., Grover, V., & Fiedler, K. D. (2012) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2012.11.002 · Cited by 86
A multi-level model of individual information privacy beliefs
Li, Y. (2013) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2013.08.002 · Cited by 85
Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference
Fox, P., McGuinness, D. L., Poirer, L., Boldi, P., & Kinder‐Kurlanda, K. (2017) · doi:10.1145/3091478 · Cited by 76
Cultural values and Facebook use among Palestinian youth in Israel
Abbas, R., & Mesch, G. S. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.031 · Cited by 75
To share or not to share? Adolescents’ self-disclosure about peer relationships on Facebook: An application of the Prototype Willingness Model
Gool, E. V., Ouytsel, J. V., Ponnet, K. S., & Walrave, M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.036 · Cited by 73
Risk-taking as a Learning Process for Shaping Teen's Online Information Privacy Behaviors
Jia, H., Wisniewski, P. J., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675287 · Cited by 70
Untitled work
(2012) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 66
Here’s my location, for your information: The impact of trust, benefits, and social influence on location sharing application use among Indonesian university students
Beldad, A. D., & Kusumadewi, M. C. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.047 · Cited by 63
200-11-12 Principles of Microeconomics
Hurst, E. (2011) · Exhibit - A Showcase of Scholarship, Creativity and Preservation Provided by Xavier University Library (Xavier University) · Cited by 62
Location disclosure on LB-SNAs: The role of incentives on sharing behavior
Koohikamali, M., Gerhart, N., & Mousavizadeh, M. (2015) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.008 · Cited by 61
A privacy-aware feature selection method for solving the personalization–privacy paradox in mobile wellness healthcare services
Lee, N., & Kwon, O. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.031 · Cited by 56
Unpicking the privacy paradox: can structuration theory help to explain location-based privacy decisions?
Zafeiropoulou, A. M., Millard, D. E., Webber, C., & O'Hara, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2464464.2464503 · Cited by 53
Understanding user adoption of location-based services from a dual perspective of enablers and inhibitors
Zhou, T. (2013) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-013-9413-1 · Cited by 51
Can an Algorithm Know the "Real You"?
Warshaw, J., Matthews, T. L., Whittaker, S., Kau, C., Bengualid, M., & Smith, B. A. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702274 · Cited by 51
Addressing the Privacy Paradox by Expanded Privacy Awareness – The Example of Context-Aware Services
Deuker, A. (2010) · IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14282-6_23 · Cited by 48
Type Indeterminacy in Privacy Decisions: The Privacy Paradox Revisited
Flender, C., & Müller, G. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35659-9_14 · Cited by 46
Effects of security warnings and instant gratification cues on attitudes toward mobile websites
Zhang, B., Wu, M., Kang, H., Go, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2014) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557347 · Cited by 43
Investigating Effects of Control and Ads Awareness on Android Users' Privacy Behaviors and Perceptions
Wang, N., Zhang, B., Liu, B., & Jin, H. (2015) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/2785830.2785845 · Cited by 42
Privacy Concerns and Information Disclosure: An Illusion of Control Hypothesis
Brandimarte, L. (2018) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · doi:10.1184/r1/6471842 · Cited by 24
Explaining the effect of event valence on unrealistic optimism
Gold, R. S., & Brown, M. G. (2009) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548500802241910 · Cited by 17
Social networks
Becker, L., & Pousttchi, K. (2012) · International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services (iiWAS) · doi:10.1145/2428736.2428767 · Cited by 13

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

B2B International with Kaspersky Lab (2015). Consumer security risks survey. From scared to aware: digital lives in 2015. B2B International with Kaspersky Lab. https://press.kaspersky.com/files/2015/07/Kaspersky_Lab_Consumer_Security_Risks_Survey_2015_ENG.pdf/ Accessed 01 March 2017.

Sorted by citations

Secrets and Likes: The Drive for Privacy and the Difficulty of Achieving It in the Digital Age
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1191 · Cited by 330
“It wouldn't happen to me”: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica scandal
Hinds, J. M., Williams, E., & Joinson, A. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102498 · Cited by 281
The effect of the perceived risk on the adoption of the sharing economy in the tourism industry: The case of Airbnb
Yi, J., Gao, Y., & Yoo, C. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102108 · Cited by 263
Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals
Cobben, D., Ooms, W., Roijakkers, N., & Radziwon, A. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046 · Cited by 285
Service integration in omnichannel retailing and its impact on customer experience
Quach, S., Barari, M. M., Moudrý, D. V., & Quach, K. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102267 · Cited by 224

See all 512

Authors: Gerber, N., Gerber, P., & Volkamer, M.
Affiliations: Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author: Gerber, Nina
ORCID: Gerber, Nina
Volkamer, Melanie
Venue: Computers & Security
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2018-08
Volume: 77
Pages: 226-261
ISSN: 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002
OpenAlex: W2798247400
Cited by: 511
References: 70
Citations by year: 2026: 62 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4
FWCI: 11.09
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (KIS1DSD066)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords: privacy paradox, privacy behavior, privacy calculus, disclosure intention, personal data protection, privacy concerns, website trust, computer anxiety, online privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks