Cited by 239Sport Psychology and PerformanceMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychological Treatments and Assessments

A systematic review of interventions to increase awareness of mental health and well-being in athletes, coaches and officials

Open access
Breslin, Gavin, Shannon, Stephen, Haughey, Tandy, Donnelly, Paul, Leavey, Gerard·2017·Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to conduct a systematic review determining the effect of sport-specific mental health awareness programs to improve mental health knowledge and help-seeking among sports coaches, athletes and officials. The second aim was to review the study quality and to report on the validity of measures that were used to determine the effectiveness of programs. METHODS: Sport-specific mental health awareness programs adopting an experimental or quasi-experimental design were included for synthesis. Six electronic databases were searched: PsycINFO, MEDLINE (OVID interface), Scopus, Cochrane, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus. Each database was searched from its year of inception to October 2016. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane and QATSQ tools. RESULTS: Ten studies were included from the 1216 studies retrieved: four comprising coaches or service providers, one with officials, four with athletes, and one involved a combination of coaches and athletes. A range of outcomes was used to assess indices of mental health awareness and well-being. Mental health referral efficacy was improved in six studies, while three reported an increase in knowledge about mental health disorders. However, seven studies did not report effect sizes for their outcomes, limiting clinically meaningful interpretations. Furthermore, there was substantial heterogeneity and limited validity in the outcome measures of mental health knowledge and referral efficacy. Seven studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Further, well-designed controlled intervention studies are required. Researchers, practitioners and policy makers should adhere to available methodological guidance and apply the psychological theory of behaviour change when developing and evaluating complex interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016040178.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13643-017-0568-6

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]Higgins JP Green S Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Wiley Online Library 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breslin, G., Shannon, S., Haughey, T., Donnelly, P., & Leavey, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Sport Ireland (IE)
Corresponding author
Shannon, Stephen
Venue
Systematic Reviews
Published
2017-08-31
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
177-177
ISSN
2046-4053 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2751258775
Cited by
239
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
The project was funded by Sport Northern Ireland and Ulster University’s PhD Challenge Fund.
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
mental health awareness, mental health promotion, athletes, sports coaches, sports officials, help-seeking, mental health knowledge, mental health referral, well-being, behaviour change interventions, intervention validity, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Awareness, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Sports, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review