Cited by 14Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The Effects of Inquiry-Based Stress Reduction (IBSR) on Mental Health and Well-Being among a Non-Clinical Sample

Smernoff, Eric, Mitnik, Inbal, Lev-ari, Shahar·2019·Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background Mental problems are highly common among the general population. Mind-body interventions were found to be highly effective in treating them. The current study assessed the effect of Inquiry-Based Stress Reduction (IBSR) meditation on psychological parameters in a general population sample.Methods Ninety-seven Participants enrolled in a 28-day workshop and completed a set of self-administered measures before and after the workshop. Outcome measures included Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology-Self Report (QIDS-SR 16), Outcome Questionnaire OQ-45.2, The Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form (STAI), State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) (State), Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS), Eating Attitudes Test (EAT).Results BDI scale decreased significantly before and after the intervention. QIDS scale improved significantly from T1 to T2 (p < 0.001). Outcome questionnaire decreased significantly at T2. Quality of life scores improved significantly between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001). Anxiety state and trait scores decreased significantly after the intervention (p < 0.001) All the subscales of anger decreased significantly after the intervention (p < 0.001).Subjective happiness improved significantly (p < 0.001).Conclusions IBSR meditation improved various psychological scales among a general population sample. Further controlled studies should evaluate the clinical implementation of IBSR among the general population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.10.015

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smernoff, E., Mitnik, I., & Lev-ari, S.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
34
Pages
30-34
ISSN
1744-3881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898103164
Cited by
14
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
“The Work” Foundation, USA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
meditation, mind-body interventions, stress reduction, mental health, well-being, anxiety, anger, quality of life, subjective happiness, eating attitudes, non-clinical population
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Meditation, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review