Cited by 247Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersWilliams Syndrome Research

Autism spectrum disorder

Open access
Frith, Uta, Happé, Francesca·2005·Current Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.033

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frith, U., & Happé, F.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
15
Issue
19
Pages
R786-R790
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966335466
Cited by
245
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, developmental disorders, repetitive behavior, autism etiology, symptom heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Brain, Cognition, Visual Perception, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review