Cited by 173Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyChromosomal and Genetic Variations

The NK homeobox gene cluster predates the origin of Hox genes.

Open access
Larroux, Claire, Fahey, Bryony, Degnan, Sandie M., Adamski, Marcin, Rokhsar, Daniel S., Degnan, Bernard M.·2007·Current Biology

Abstract

Hox and other Antennapedia (ANTP)-like homeobox gene subclasses - ParaHox, EHGbox, and NK-like - contribute to key developmental events in bilaterians [1-4]. Evidence of physical clustering of ANTP genes in multiple animal genomes [4-9] suggests that all four subclasses arose via sequential cis-duplication events. Here, we show that Hox genes' origin occurred after the divergence of sponge and eumetazoan lineages and occurred concomitantly with a major evolutionary transition in animal body-plan complexity. By using whole genome information from the demosponge Amphimedon queenslandica, we provide the first conclusive evidence that the earliest metazoans possessed multiple NK-like genes but no Hox, ParaHox, or EHGbox genes. Six of the eight NK-like genes present in the Amphimedon genome are clustered within 71 kb in an order akin to bilaterian NK clusters. We infer that the NK cluster in the last common ancestor to sponges, cnidarians, and bilaterians consisted of at least five genes. It appears that the ProtoHox gene originated from within this ancestral cluster after the divergence of sponge and eumetazoan lineages. The maintenance of the NK cluster in sponges and bilaterians for greater than 550 million years is likely to reflect regulatory constraints inherent to the organization of this ancient cluster.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.008

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The origination of Hox genes and expansion of a range of developmental transcription factor gene families enabled further elaboration of ancestral gene regulatory networks.

    “Along with the diversification signalling pathways in eumetazoans was the origination of Hox genes [24] and expansion of a range of developmental transcription factor gene families [23], [28, unpublished], which enabled further elaboration of ancestral gene regulatory networks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larroux, C., Fahey, B., Degnan, S. M., Adamski, M., Rokhsar, D. S., & Degnan, B. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Joint Genome Institute (US)
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
706-710
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998231969
Cited by
173
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
ParaHox genes, gene cluster evolution, sponge evolution, Amphimedon queenslandica, last common ancestor, animal evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Cnidaria, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Genes, Homeobox, Multigene Family, Invertebrates, Porifera, Genome, DNA, Complementary, Evolution, Molecular, Gastropoda, Antennapedia Homeodomain Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review