Cited by 180Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyProtist diversity and phylogenyMarine Sponges and Natural Products

Sponge phylogeny, animal monophyly, and the origin of the nervous system: 18S rRNA evidence

Cavalier-Smith, T., Allsopp, M. T. E. P., Chao, E. E., Boury-Esnault, N., Vacelet, J.·1996·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

We sequenced 18S rRNA genes of a calcareous sponge, Clathrina cerebrum, a demosponge, Axinella polypoides, and a zoanthid cnidarian, Parazoanthus axinellae. Our phylogenetic analysis supports the monophyly of kingdom Animalia and confirms that choanoflagellate protozoans are their closest relatives. Sponges as a whole are monophyletic, but possibly paraphyletic; demosponges and hexactinellids form a monophyletic group of silicious sponges. Our phylogenetic trees support a monophyletic origin of the nervous system in the immediate common ancestor of Cnidaria and Ctenophora. They weakly suggest that animals with a nervous system may be more closely related to calcareous sponges than to silicious sponges; the nervous system might have originated in an early calcareous sponge. Our trees confirm that Myxozoa and Placozoa are animals that arose by secondary loss of the nervous system, but suggest that Myxozoa may be sisters of, rather than derived from, Bilateria. Kingdom Animalia is divided into four subkingdoms: Radiata (Porifera, Cnidaria, Placozoa, Ctenophora), Myxozoa, Mesozoa, and Bilateria. The 18S rRNA genes of Myxozoa evolved over twice as fast as in Radiata. Comparison with the fossil record reveals a brief 10-fold (or greater) acceleration in the rate of rRNA evolution in early Bilateria followed by normal low rates for about 500 million years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z96-231

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavalier-Smith, T., Allsopp, M. T. E. P., Chao, E. E., Boury-Esnault, N., & Vacelet, J.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
1996-11-01
Volume
74
Issue
11
Pages
2031-2045
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
OpenAlex
W2077908307
Cited by
180
References
90
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Illinois State University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
Keywords
sponge phylogeny, 18S rRNA, calcareous sponges, demosponges, Hexactinellida, choanoflagellates, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Myxozoa, Placozoa, molecular clock, sponges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review