Cited by 289Reading and Literacy DevelopmentMultisensory perception and integrationNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Reduced neural integration of letters and speech sounds links phonological and reading deficits in adult dyslexia.

Open access
Blau, Vera, van Atteveldt, Nienke, Ekkebus, Michel, Goebel, Rainer, Blomert, Leo·2009·Current Biology

Abstract

Developmental dyslexia is a specific reading and spelling deficit affecting 4% to 10% of the population. Advances in understanding its origin support a core deficit in phonological processing characterized by difficulties in segmenting spoken words into their minimally discernable speech segments (speech sounds, or phonemes) and underactivation of left superior temporal cortex. A suggested but unproven hypothesis is that this phonological deficit impairs the ability to map speech sounds onto their homologous visual letters, which in turn prevents the attainment of fluent reading levels. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated the neural processing of letters and speech sounds in unisensory (visual, auditory) and multisensory (audiovisual congruent, audiovisual incongruent) conditions as a function of reading ability. Our data reveal that adult dyslexic readers underactivate superior temporal cortex for the integration of letters and speech sounds. This reduced audiovisual integration is directly associated with a more fundamental deficit in auditory processing of speech sounds, which in turn predicts performance on phonological tasks. The data provide a neurofunctional account of developmental dyslexia, in which phonological processing deficits are linked to reading failure through a deficit in neural integration of letters and speech sounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.065

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blau, V., van Atteveldt, N., Ekkebus, M., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Blau, Vera
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
503-508
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993812365
Cited by
289
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
33.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
developmental dyslexia, phonological processing, audiovisual integration, superior temporal cortex, multisensory integration, auditory speech processing, reading failure, phonological deficit, adults with dyslexia
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Perception, Auditory Perceptual Disorders, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dyslexia, Hearing, Humans, Language Disorders, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Incidence, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review