Cited by 74Memory Processes and InfluencesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Recall of Others’ Actions after Incidental Encoding Reveals Episodic-like Memory in Dogs

Open access
Fugazza, Claudia, Pogány, Ákos, Miklósi, Ádám·2016·Current Biology

Abstract

The existence of episodic memory in non-human animals is a debated topic that has been investigated using different methodologies that reflect diverse theoretical approaches to its definition. A fundamental feature of episodic memory is recalling after incidental encoding, which can be assessed if the recall test is unexpected [1]. We used a modified version of the "Do as I Do" method [2], relying on dogs' ability to imitate human actions, to test whether dogs can rely on episodic memory when recalling others' actions from the past. Dogs were first trained to imitate human actions on command. Next, they were trained to perform a simple training exercise (lying down), irrespective of the previously demonstrated action. This way, we substituted their expectation to be required to imitate with the expectation to be required to lie down. We then tested whether dogs recalled the demonstrated actions by unexpectedly giving them the command to imitate, instead of lying down. Dogs were tested with a short (1 min) and a long (1 hr) retention interval. They were able to recall the demonstrated actions after both intervals; however, their performance declined more with time compared to conditions in which imitation was expected. These findings show that dogs recall past events as complex as human actions even if they do not expect the memory test, providing evidence for episodic-like memory. Dogs offer an ideal model to study episodic memory in non-human species, and this methodological approach allows investigating memory of complex, context-rich events. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.057

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies use non-natural methodological elements to test for episodic-like memory, such as pecking or approaching shapes or coloured panels, or requiring subjects to recall their own or others' previous actions out of an array of behaviours.

    “Some studies, however, use non-natural methodological elements to test for episodic-like memory [75], such as pecking or approaching certain shapes or coloured panels that are presented in front of the subjects [56,78–81], or requiring subjects to recall their own or others’ previous actions out of an array of behaviours [95,96].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [96]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fugazza, C., Pogány, Á., & Miklósi, Á.
Affiliations
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Corresponding author
Fugazza, Claudia
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
26
Issue
23
Pages
3209-3213
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2555649743
Cited by
74
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
episodic-like memory, dogs, incidental encoding, retention interval, animal cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Dogs, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Memory, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review