Cited by 14Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal Infections and Studies

Post-antifungal effects and time-kill studies of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against Candida glabrata and Candida parapsilosis

Smith, Raymond P., Baltch, Aldona, Bopp, Lawrence H., Ritz, William J., Michelsen, Phyllis P.·2011·Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Abstract

Candida glabrata (Cgl) and Candida parapsilosis (Cpa) can cause serious infections and can be resistant to some antifungal drugs. In treating infections caused by these organisms, killing rates and post-antifungal effects (PAFE) are important factors in both dose interval choice and outcome. Two strains each of Cgl and Cpa were studied. For PAFE studies, each organism was exposed to micafungin (MCF), anidulafungin (ANF), or caspofungin (CAS) for 1 h at concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 16×MIC. Cell suspensions were then washed 3 times and resuspended in fresh broth. Time 0 was immediately after resuspension of the yeast. Time-kill experiments were done using similar drug concentrations. Samples were removed at each time point (0-120 h) and viable counts determined. PAFE of ANF and CAS were generally very long, were markedly longer than those of MCF, and increased with increased drug concentration. For ANF and CAS, PAFE for Cgl were greater than those for Cpa only at 0.5 to 2 × MIC. Time-kill experiments showed that ANF, CAS, and MCF were fungicidal at 8 to 16 × MIC up to 120 h. CAS had the greatest activity against Cgl, while ANF and MCF were more active than CAS against Cpa. Because of the prolonged PAFE of these echinocandins, especially ANF and CAS, less frequent dosing during therapy of Cpa and Cgl infections could be considered. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of longer dosing intervals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.06.018

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time-kill experiments in vitro have shown that most C. glabrata cells die quickly when exposed to high doses of echinocandins, while a small and variable subpopulation dies more slowly, suggesting possible development of long-lived persister cells.

    “Time-kill experiments in vitro have shown that most C. glabrata cells die quickly when exposed to high doses of echinocandins, while a small and variable subpopulation dies more slowly (29, 30), suggesting the possible development of long-lived persister cells.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, R. P., Baltch, A., Bopp, L. H., Ritz, W. J., & Michelsen, P. P.
Affiliations
  • Albany Stratton VA Medical Center Albany (US)
  • SUNY Cobleskill (US)
Corresponding author
Baltch, Aldona
Venue
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
131-138
ISSN
0732-8893 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986079333
Cited by
14
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shandong Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
post-antifungal effect, time-kill kinetics, anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, echinocandins, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, antifungal resistance, fungicidal activity, dosing interval, antifungal susceptibility
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review