Cited by 956Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Candidemia in 2019 Patients: Data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy Alliance Registry

Horn, David L., Neofytos, Dionissios, Anaissie, Elias J., Fishman, Jay A., Steinbach, William J., Olyaei, Ali J., Marr, Kieren A., Pfaller, Michael A. +2 more·2009·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Candidemia remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the health care setting, and the epidemiology of Candida infection is changing. METHODS: Clinical data from patients with candidemia were extracted from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) Alliance database, a comprehensive registry that collects information regarding invasive fungal infections. A total of 2019 patients, enrolled from 1 July 2004 through 5 March 2008, were identified. Data regarding the candidemia episode were analyzed, including the specific fungal species and patient survival at 12 weeks after diagnosis. RESULTS: The incidence of candidemia caused by non-Candida albicans Candida species (54.4%) was higher than the incidence of candidemia caused by C. albicans (45.6%). The overall, crude 12-week mortality rate was 35.2%. Patients with Candida parapsilosis candidemia had the lowest mortality rate (23.7%; P<.001) and were less likely to be neutropenic (5.1%; P<.001) and to receive corticosteroids (33.5%; P<.001) or other immunosuppressive drugs (7.9%; P=.002), compared with patients infected with other Candida species. Candida krusei candidemia was most commonly associated with prior use of antifungal agents (70.6%; P<.001), hematologic malignancy (52.9%; P<.001) or stem cell transplantation (17.7%; P<.001), neutropenia (45.1%; P<.001), and corticosteroid treatment (60.8%; P<.001). Patients with C. krusei candidemia had the highest crude 12-week mortality in this series (52.9%; P<.001). Fluconazole was the most commonly administered antimicrobial, followed by the echinocandins, and amphotericin B products were infrequently administered. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology and choice of therapy for candidemia are rapidly changing. Additional study is warranted to differentiate host factors and differences in virulence among Candida species and to determine the best therapeutic regimen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/599039

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two RCTs have been published; one failed to achieve a difference in time-to-antimicrobials between arms and the other found no significant difference in mortality despite a 90-minute difference in median time interval to antimicrobial administration.

    “Two RCTs have been published (119, 120); one failed to achieve a difference in time-to-antimicrobials between arms (120) and the other found no significant difference in mortality despite a 90-minute difference in median time interval to antimicrobial administration (119).”
  • Observational studies suggest that mortality may increase after intervals exceeding 3-5 hours from hospital arrival and/or sepsis recognition.

    “Observational studies do, however, suggest that mortality may increase after intervals exceeding 3-5 hours from hospital arrival and/or sepsis recognition (98,111,119,120).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horn, D. L., Neofytos, D., Anaissie, E. J., Fishman, J. A., Steinbach, W. J., Olyaei, A. J., Marr, K. A., Pfaller, M. A., Chang, C., & Webster, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Iowa Health Care (US)
Corresponding author
Horn, David L.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2009-06-15
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
1695-1703
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2117166221
Cited by
956
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 79
FWCI
50.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Miami
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Emory University
  • Bunning Food Allergy Institute, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • City of Hope
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
candidemia, invasive fungal infections, non-albicans Candida, Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei, mortality, neutropenia, corticosteroids, antifungal therapy, fluconazole, echinocandins, amphotericin B, hematologic malignancies, stem cell transplantation, epidemiology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Fluconazole, Incidence, Survival Analysis, Fungemia, Treatment Outcome, Echinocandins, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review