Cited by 20Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesLiver Disease and Transplantation

Echinocandins for management of invasive candidiasis in patients with liver disease and liver transplantation

Open access
Yeoh, Siang Fei, Lee, Tae Jin, Chew, Ka Lip, Lin, Stephen, Yeo, Dennis, Setia, Sajita·2018·Infection and Drug Resistance

Abstract

species remains one of the most important causes of opportunistic infections worldwide. Invasive candidiasis (IC) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in liver disease (LD) patients if not treated promptly. Echinocandins are often recommended as a first-line empirical treatment for managing IC and can especially play a critical role in managing IC in LD patients. However, advanced LD patients are often immunocompromised and critically ill. Hence altered pharmacokinetics, drug interactions as well as tolerance issues of antifungal treatments are a concern in these patients. This comprehensive review examines the epidemiology, risk factors and diagnosis of IC in patients with LD and evaluates differences between three available echinocandins for treating this group of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/idr.s165676

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeoh, S. F., Lee, T. J., Chew, K. L., Lin, S., Yeo, D., & Setia, S.
Affiliations
  • National University Health System (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National University Hospital (SG)
  • Pfizer (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Setia, Sajita
Venue
Infection and Drug Resistance
Published
2018-05
Volume
Volume 11
Pages
805-819
ISSN
1178-6973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806463970
Cited by
20
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infection and Drug Resistance (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
echinocandins, invasive candidiasis, liver disease, liver transplantation, antifungal therapy, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, immunocompromised patients, Candida species, risk factors, diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review