Cited by 97Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Effects of fixed or self-titrated dosages of Sativex on cannabis withdrawal and cravings.

Open access
Trigo, Jose M., Lagzdins, Dina, Rehm, Jürgen, Selby, Peter, Gamaleddin, Islam, Fischer, Benedikt, Barnes, Allan J., Huestis, Marilyn A. +1 more·2016·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background There is currently no pharmacological treatment approved for cannabis dependence. In this proof of concept study, we assessed the feasibility/effects of fixed and self-titrated dosages of Sativex (1:1, Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/cannabidiol (CBD)) on craving and withdrawal from cannabis among nine community-recruited cannabis-dependent subjects.Methods Participants underwent an 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial (an ABACADAE design), with four smoke as usual conditions (SAU) (A) separated by four cannabis abstinence conditions (B-E), with administration of either self-titrated/fixed doses of placebo or Sativex (up to 108 mg THC/100 mg CBD). The order of medication administration during abstinence conditions was randomized and counterbalanced. Withdrawal symptoms and craving were assessed using the Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS), Marijuana Withdrawal Checklist (MWC) and Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ). Medication use was assessed during the study by means of self-reports, vial weight control, toxicology and metabolite analysis. Cannabis use was assessed by means of self-reports.Results High fixed doses of Sativex were well tolerated and significantly reduced cannabis withdrawal during abstinence, but not craving, as compared to placebo. Self-titrated doses were lower and showed limited efficacy as compared to high fixed doses. Participants reported a significantly lower "high" following Sativex or placebo as compared to SAU conditions. Cannabis/medication use along the study, as per self-reports, suggests compliance with the study conditions.Conclusions The results found in this proof of concept study warrant further systematic exploration of Sativex as a treatment option for cannabis withdrawal and dependence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.020

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The THC/CBD mixture reduced withdrawal symptoms and improved retention in treatment in a clinical trial and a human laboratory study.

    “was able to reduce withdrawal symptoms and improve retention in treatment in both a clinical trial 58 and a human laboratory study 59.”

    From Psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for the treatment of cannabis use disorder (2018) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Results (§3.4) show that fixed-dose Sativex reduced cannabis withdrawal compared with placebo in the human laboratory study. The paper does not report improved treatment retention in that study; its Introduction (§1) attributes the retention finding to an earlier clinical trial, while Results (§3.1) reports study completion without a retention comparison. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The THC/CBD mixture did not elicit greater reduction in cannabis use compared with placebo.

    “despite not eliciting greater reduction in cannabis use when compared with placebo”
  • The THC/CBD mixture does not elicit as much of a psychoactive effect as cannabis.

    “Recent studies report that the THC/CBD mixture does not elicit as much of a psychoactive effect as cannabis”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trigo, J. M., Lagzdins, D., Rehm, J., Selby, P., Gamaleddin, I., Fischer, B., Barnes, A. J., Huestis, M. A., & Le Foll, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Ain Shams University (EG)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
161
Pages
298-306
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2276226615
Cited by
97
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (115548_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
Sativex, cannabis use disorder, cannabis withdrawal, cannabis craving, THC, cannabidiol, cannabis abstinence, treatment efficacy, tolerability
MeSH terms
Adult, Cannabidiol, Cannabis, Marijuana Abuse, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Dronabinol, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review