Cited by 123School Choice and PerformanceEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducational Assessment and Improvement

What a difference a day makes: Estimating daily learning gains during kindergarten and first grade using a natural experiment

Fitzpatrick, Maria D., Grissmer, David, Hastedt, Sarah·2011·Economics of Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.09.004

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fitzpatrick, Grissmer, and Hastedt (2011) estimate a drop of around 0.3 of a standard deviation in math scores and 0.4 in reading scores as the result of a 12-week school closure.

    “Fitzpatrick, Grissmer, and Hastedt (2011) estimate stronger impacts for the early years of schooling, implying a drop of around 0.3 of a standard deviation in math scores and 0.4 in reading scores as the result of a 12-week school closure.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Fitzpatrick, Grissmer, and Hastedt (2011)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitzpatrick, M. D., Grissmer, D., & Hastedt, S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Fitzpatrick, Maria D.
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
269-279
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064382516
Cited by
123
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
22.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
early childhood education, kindergarten, first grade, school influence, reading achievement, mathematics achievement, Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, assessment timing, natural experiment, skill accumulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review