Cited by 15Ovarian function and disordersNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

PCOS patients differ in meal timings rather than total caloric or macronutrient intake in comparison to weight matched controls

Kulshreshtha, Bindu, Sharma, Neera, Pant, Shubhi, Sharma, Lokesh, Pahuja, Bhawna, Singh, Priyanka·2022·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Background There is paucity of data related to dietary patterns in women with PCOS with heterogenous phenotypes compared to weight matched healthy women. In the present study, we studied the influence of diet and dietary patterns in relation to BMI and phenotype of PCOS women. Design Case control study in a tertiary care hospital. Patients 168 PCOS women and 102 age matched healthy women were recruited. All were subjected to clinical examination, biochemical, hormonal and dietary assessment based on 2-day dietary recall and direct interview by dieticians. Results There was no difference in the total energy and macronutrient distribution among the lean and obese PCOS women compared to weight matched controls. There was a higher junk intake and lower fibre intake among PCOS patients compared to controls. There was no difference in the total energy or macronutrient distribution or meal timings among different phenotypes of PCOS. Around 40% PCOS women had a late/missed breakfast pattern compared to 15% of healthy controls (p-0.00). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, we observed that late breakfast and late lunch patterns were associated with PCOS independent of BMI (OR-3.3[CI- 1.7-6.8] and 3.0 [CI- 1.2-6.9]). Junk intake was correlated with BMI, glucose and cholesterol levels and dairy intake was correlated with hirsuitism score. Conclusion We demonstrate for the first time that PCOS women differ significantly from weight matched controls in the timings of their breakfast and lunch intake rather than the total caloric intake and macronutrient distribution. Whether correction of meal timings and food choices can improve the phenotypic manifestations of PCOS remains to be seen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.12.023

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulshreshtha, B., Sharma, N., Pant, S., Sharma, L., Pahuja, B., & Singh, P.
Affiliations
Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
Kulshreshtha, Bindu
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
270
Pages
11-16
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W4205243696
Cited by
15
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Council of Medical Research (2013-0976)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, meal timing, dietary habits, junk food intake, dietary fiber intake, PCOS phenotypes, body mass index, hirsutism, dairy consumption, macronutrient intake
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Diet, Eating, Female, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review