The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 44 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Conversely, if players know that their own score is passed on, they are much more likely to donate than otherwise 59,60 .”
From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,279
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
McGinn, L. C. (1957) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(57)90766-4 · Cited by 7,284
Nielsen, R. P., & Axelrod, R. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257983 · Cited by 6,517
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 · Cited by 4,868
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
Rabin, M. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,614
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Roth, 1991, Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh and Tokyo, American Economic Review, 81, 1068
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of indirect reciprocity
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04131 · Cited by 2,762
Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,308
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006) · Handbook on the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism · doi:10.1016/s1574-0714(06)01008-6 · Cited by 1,246
Rand, D. G. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004 · Cited by 699
The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment
Rockenbach, B., & Milinski, M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05229 · Cited by 501
Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment
Gächter, S., & Herrmann, B. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0275 · Cited by 484
Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704598104 · Cited by 396
SEXUAL SELECTION FOR MORAL VIRTUES
Miller, G. F. (2007) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/517857 · Cited by 338
Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism
Everett, J. A. C., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015 · Cited by 310
Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment
Yoeli, E., Hoffman, M., Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1301210110 · Cited by 285
Indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game
Engelmann, D., & Fischbacher, U. (2009) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.006 · Cited by 249
Nowak, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.01.014 · Cited by 242
Supply Chain Visibility and Social Responsibility: Investigating Consumers’ Behaviors and Motives
Kraft, T., Valdés, L., & Zheng, Y. (2014) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2017.0685 · Cited by 234
Priorities in social categories
Kinzler, K. D., Shutts, K., & Correll, J. (2010) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.739 · Cited by 212
Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. P. M. (2011) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.04.002 · Cited by 217
‘Rational’ Theories of Voter Turnout: A Review
Geys, B. (2006) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.00034.x · Cited by 188
Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity
Baker, W. E., & Bulkley, N. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0920 · Cited by 187
Offer, S. (2012) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392112454754 · Cited by 175
What Do Laboratory Experiments Tell Us About the Real World
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2006) · Cited by 176
Session-effects in the laboratory
Fréchette, G. R. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9309-1 · Cited by 172
Indirect reciprocity with private, noisy, and incomplete information
Hilbe, C., Schmid, L., Tkadlec, J., Chatterjee, K., & Nowak, M. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810565115 · Cited by 173
Conflict, sticks and carrots: war increases prosocial punishments and rewards
Gneezy, A., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0805 · Cited by 158
Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation
Knoch, D., Schneider, F., Schunk, D., Hohmann, M., & Fehr, E. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911619106 · Cited by 168
Reputation, a universal currency for human social interactions
Milinski, M. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0100 · Cited by 170
Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., & Milinski, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0762 · Cited by 158
Measuring indirect reciprocity: Whose back do we scratch?
Stanca, L. (2008) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.07.010 · Cited by 152
Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective
Cai, W., Polzin, F., & Stam, E. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120412 · Cited by 145
Helping Other CEOs Avoid Bad Press
Westphal, J. D., Park, S. H., McDonald, M. L., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2012) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839212453267 · Cited by 148
Indirect Punishment and Generosity Toward Strangers
Ule, A., Schram, A. J. H. C., Riedl, A. M., & Cason, T. N. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1178883 · Cited by 134
Self-citationThe effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation
Gallo, E., & Chang, Y. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1415883112 · Cited by 134
Trust and trustworthiness reputations in an investment game
Charness, G., Du, N., & Yang, C.-L. (2010) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.002 · Cited by 128
Sylwester, K., & Roberts, G. (2013) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.009 · Cited by 123
The social neuroscience of reputation
Izuma, K. (2012) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2012.01.003 · Cited by 119
Moral assessment in indirect reciprocity
Sigmund, K. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.024 · Cited by 105
A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity
Okada, I. (2020) · Games · doi:10.3390/g11030027 · Cited by 110
Third-party punishers are rewarded, but third-party helpers even more so
Raihani, N. J., & Bshary, R. (2015) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12637 · Cited by 101
The benefits of being seen to help others: indirect reciprocity and reputation-based partner choice
Roberts, G., Raihani, N., Bshary, R., Manrique, H. M., Fariña, A., Samu, F., & Barclay, P. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0290 · Cited by 110
A Meeting of the Minds: Informal Agreements and Social Norms
Krupka, E. L., Leider, S., & Jiang, M. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2429 · Cited by 96
Inducing Social Norms in Laboratory Allocation Choices
Schram, A. J. H. C., & Charness, G. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2073 · Cited by 90
Self-citationAn exploration of third and second party punishment in ten simple games
Leibbrandt, A., & López‐Pérez, R. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.09.018 · Cited by 90
Third-party sanctioning and compensation behavior: Findings from the ultimatum game
Chavez, A. K., & Bicchieri, C. (2013) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2013.09.004 · Cited by 91
On the social nature of eyes: The effect of social cues in interaction and individual choice tasks
Baillon, A., Selim, A., & van Dolder, D. (2013) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.12.001 · Cited by 94
Herrmann, E., Keupp, S., Hare, B. A., Vaish, A., & Tomasello, M. (2012) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028929 · Cited by 95
Effect of private information on indirect reciprocity
Uchida, S. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.82.036111 · Cited by 84
Pfeiffer, T., Tran, L. H., Krumme, C., & Rand, D. G. (2012) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0332 · Cited by 89
Learning to cooperate via indirect reciprocity
Berger, U. (2010) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2010.08.009 · Cited by 82
The competition of assessment rules for indirect reciprocity
Uchida, S., & Sigmund, K. (2009) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.013 · Cited by 82
Stability of cooperation under image scoring in group interactions
Nax, H. H., Perc, M., Szolnoki, A., & Helbing, D. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12145 · Cited by 73
Prosocial modeling: A meta-analytic review and synthesis.
Jung, H., Seo, E., Han, E., Henderson, M. D., & Patall, E. A. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000235 · Cited by 80
Westphal, J. D., & Park, S. H. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198792055.001.0001 · Cited by 74
Two distinct neural mechanisms underlying indirect reciprocity
Watanabe, T., Takezawa, M., Nakawake, Y., Kunimatsu, A., Yamasue, H., Nakamura, M., Miyashita, Y., & Masuda, N. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1318570111 · Cited by 78
Reputational cues in repeated trust games
Boero, R., Bravo, G., Castellani, M., & Squazzoni, F. (2009) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.05.004 · Cited by 78
Good Guys Can Finish First: How Brand Reputation Affects Extension Evaluations
Johnson, Z. S., Mao, H., Lefebvre, S., & Ganesh, J. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1109 · Cited by 81
Are we nice(r) to nice(r) people?—An experimental analysis
Albert, M., Güth, W., Kirchler, E., & Maciejovsky, B. (2007) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9131-3 · Cited by 69
Hauser, O., Nowak, M. A., & Rand, D. G. (2013) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.06.041 · Cited by 67
Demonstrating knowledge: The effects of group status on outgroup helping
van Leeuwen, E., & Täuber, S. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.008 · Cited by 66
Reputation-based cooperation: empirical evidence for behavioral strategies
Swakman, V., Molleman, L., Ule, A., & Egas, M. (2015) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.12.001 · Cited by 71
Indirect Reciprocity and Strategic Reputation Building in an Experimental Helping Game
Engelmann, D., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.352540 · Cited by 64
Harnessing the Power of Reputation: Strengths and Limits for Promoting Cooperative Behaviors
Barclay, P. (2012) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491201000509 · Cited by 67
Mechanisms of Generalized Exchange: Towards an Integrated ModelPreprint
Baker, W. E., & Levine, S. S. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1352101 · Cited by 60
From interpersonal to interorganisational trust: The role of indirect reciprocity
Vanneste, B. S. (2016) · Journal of Trust Research · doi:10.1080/21515581.2015.1108849 · Cited by 62
The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity
Santos, F. P., Pacheco, J. M., & Santos, F. C. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0291 · Cited by 61
Reputation Effects in Public and Private Interactions
Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y., & Nowak, M. A. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004527 · Cited by 60
Lee, D., Jeong, I., Lee, H. T., & Sung, H. J. (2007) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.06.009 · Cited by 52
Indirect reciprocity with optional interactions
Ghang, W., & Nowak, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.09.036 · Cited by 50
Evolution of cooperation under indirect reciprocity and arbitrary exploration rates
Santos, F. P., Pacheco, J. M., & Santos, F. C. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep37517 · Cited by 50
Young Children Show the Bystander Effect in Helping Situations
Plötner, M., Over, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615569579 · Cited by 50
Third Party Reward and Punishment: Group Size, Efficiency and Public GoodsPreprint
Almenberg, J., Dreber, A., Apicella, C. L., & Rand, D. G. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 48
Integrating Economics and System Dynamics Approaches for Modelling an Ecological–Economic System
Uehara, T., Nagase, Y., & Wakeland, W. W. (2015) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2373 · Cited by 49
On the stability of cooperation under indirect reciprocity with first-order information
Berger, U., & Grüne, A. (2016) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2016.05.003 · Cited by 49
Observability and social image: On the robustness and fragility of reciprocity
Bolton, G. E., Dimant, E., & Schmidt, U. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.09.018 · Cited by 50
Effect of assessment error and private information on stern-judging in indirect reciprocity
Uchida, S., & Sasaki, T. (2013) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2013.08.006 · Cited by 48
On the interaction of the stick and the carrot in social dilemmas
Milinski, M., & Rockenbach, B. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.014 · Cited by 49
Reciprocity, Culture, and Human Cooperation: Previous Insights and a New Crosscultural Experiment
Gekhter, S., & Херрманн, Б. (2009) · CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) · Cited by 45
Indirect Reciprocity and Charitable Giving— Evidence from a Field Experiment
Khadjavi, M. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2519 · Cited by 48
Separating reputation, social influence, and identification effects in a dictator game
Servátka, M. (2008) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.04.001 · Cited by 44
Badenfelt, U. (2010) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.003 · Cited by 45
Rietz, T. A., Sheremeta, R. M., Shields, T. W., & Smith, V. L. S. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.09.019 · Cited by 43
Indirect Reciprocity and Prosocial Behaviour: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
Mujcic, R., & Leibbrandt, A. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12474 · Cited by 44
Gossip and the efficiency of interactions
Fehr, D., & Sutter, M. (2018) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.10.003 · Cited by 43
Indirect reciprocity with trinary reputations
Tanabe, S., Suzuki, H., & Masuda, N. (2012) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.10.031 · Cited by 44
Experimental comparison of direct, general, and indirect reciprocity
Herne, K., Lappalainen, O., & Kestilä‐Kekkonen, E. (2013) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2013.04.003 · Cited by 42
The Social Contagion of Antisocial Behavior
Tsvetkova, M., & Macy, M. W. (2015) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v2.a4 · Cited by 38
Indirect Reciprocity; A Field Experiment
van Apeldoorn, J., & Schram, A. J. H. C. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152076 · Cited by 46
Self-citationHelping hands: Neighborhood diversity, deprivation, and reciprocity of support in non-kin networks
Phan, M. B., Blumer, N., & Demaiter, E. I. (2009) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407509345655 · Cited by 37
In-group favoritism and discrimination among multiple out-groups
Grimm, V., Utikal, V., & Valmasoni, L. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.08.015 · Cited by 38
Social Closure and the Evolution of Cooperation via Indirect Reciprocity
Righi, S., & Takács, K. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29290-0 · Cited by 36
ALTRUISM IN SUICIDE TERROR ORGANIZATIONS
Qirko, H. (2009) · Zygon® · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.01001.x · Cited by 35
Limited memory can be beneficial for the evolution of cooperation
Horváth, G., Kovářík, J., & Mengel, F. (2012) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.01.034 · Cited by 34
Investigating Customer-Oriented Deviance (COD) from a frontline employee's perspective
Leo, C., & Russell-Bennett, R. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2012.698636 · Cited by 32
Choi, S., Gallo, E., & Kariv, S. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199948277.013.26 · Cited by 33
Personal experience and reputation interact in human decisions to help reciprocally
Molleman, L., van den Broek, E., & Egas, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.3044 · Cited by 35
Scarce and directly beneficial reputations support cooperation
Samu, F., Számadó, S., & Takács, K. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68123-x · Cited by 33
Money and ReciprocityPreprint
Vogt, B., & Hens, T. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.361980 · Cited by 33
Trust and Trustworthiness in Anonymous Virtual Worlds
Füllbrunn, S., Richwien, K. R. K., & Sadrieh, A. (2011) · Journal of Media Economics · doi:10.1080/08997764.2011.549432 · Cited by 32
The Dark Side of Altruistic Third-Party Punishment
Leibbrandt, A., & López‐Pérez, R. (2011) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002711408010 · Cited by 32
Quantitative assessment can stabilize indirect reciprocity under imperfect information
Schmid, L., Ekbatani, F., Hilbe, C., & Chatterjee, K. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37817-x · Cited by 31
Partner Choice Drives the Evolution of Cooperation via Indirect Reciprocity
Roberts, G. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129442 · Cited by 32
Indirect Reciprocity with Optional Interactions and Private Information
Olejarz, J. W., Ghang, W., & Nowak, M. A. (2015) · Games · doi:10.3390/g6040438 · Cited by 28
Reciprocity and Giving in a Consecutive Three-Person Dictator Game with Social Interaction
Bahr, G., & Requate, T. (2013) · German Economic Review · doi:10.1111/geer.12013 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Seinen, I., & Schram, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Schram, Arthur
- ORCID
- Schram, Arthur
- Venue
- European Economic Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 581-602
- ISSN
- 0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008783805
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 18.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- indirect reciprocity, group norms, social status, costly helping, reputation, cooperation, random pairing, third-party punishment, evolution of cooperation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
