Cited by 83Frailty in Older AdultsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAging and Gerontology Research

The stress of aging

Cesari, Matteo, Vellas, Bruno, Gambassi, Giovanni·2013·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

Although the evolutionary theories of aging are quite well established, our knowledge about how we age is still very limited. The abundance and heterogeneity of available mechanistic theories of aging implicitly suggest that this phenomenon is overly complex and unlikely to be explained by a single pathway. Moreover, although aging remains a unique process, it is characterized by heterogeneous manifestations, not only determining inter-individual variations, but even intra-individual diversities. Such heterogeneity renders the inner nature of the aging process of difficult evaluation in older persons due to the potential biases introduced by multiple age-related social, biological, and clinical factors (and responsible for the evidence-based issue in geriatrics). Moving from the difficulties in translating anti-aging preclinical interventions into clinical trials, an alternative approach is illustrated. We encourage moving to a holistic evaluation of aging by adopting specific and consequent modifications in the design and conduction of clinical research. Such approach is today commonly applied in the clinical setting where the complexity of older patients often requires multidimensional interventions to adequately target the geriatric syndromes. Consistently, interventions targeting the aging process may result ineffective if too focused on a single underlying causal mechanism and/or failing to capture the complexity of the phenomenon. In this context, frailty (a geriatric syndrome characterized by age-related declines occurring across multiple physiologic systems) may indeed represent a clinically relevant threshold throughout the continuum of the aging process and a promising benchmark to test multidomain interventions against age-related conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2012.10.004

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cesari, M., Vellas, B., & Gambassi, G.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Cesari, Matteo
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
451-456
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048552357
Cited by
83
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
aging, frailty, geriatric syndromes, multidomain intervention, anti-aging interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Aged, Aging, Geriatrics, Humans, Patient Care Team, Social Adjustment, Stress, Physiological, Systems Theory, Frail Elderly, Evidence-Based Medicine, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review