Cited by 274Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota

Open access
Walsh, Calum J., Guinane, Caitriona M., O'Toole, Paul W., Cotter, Paul D.·2014·FEBS Letters

Abstract

The human gut microbiota comprises approximately 100 trillion microbial cells and has a significant effect on many aspects of human physiology including metabolism, nutrient absorption and immune function. Disruption of this population has been implicated in many conditions and diseases, including examples such as obesity, inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer that are highlighted in this review. A logical extension of these observations suggests that the manipulation of the gut microbiota can be employed to prevent or treat these conditions. Thus, here we highlight a variety of options, including the use of changes in diet (including the use of prebiotics), antimicrobial-based intervention, probiotics and faecal microbiota transplantation, and discuss their relative merits with respect to modulating the intestinal community in a beneficial way.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.03.035

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As humans have co-evolved with the microbiota, it plays a key role in programming all other bodily systems.

    “As we have co-evolved with this microbiota, it plays a key role in programming all other bodily systems (D' Argenio and Salvatore, 2015;Walsh et al., 2014).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Walsh et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, C. J., Guinane, C. M., O'Toole, P. W., & Cotter, P. D.
Affiliations
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Corresponding author
Cotter, Paul D.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-26
Volume
588
Issue
22
Pages
4120-4130
ISSN
  • 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-3468
OpenAlex
W2001738813
Cited by
274
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 13
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEBS Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • T-Stór (Teagasc) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
gut microbiota, microbiota modulation, obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, prebiotics, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, antimicrobial interventions, diet, host-microbe interactions
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Feces, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Probiotics, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review