Cited by 249Mesenchymal stem cell researchReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Biology and Fertility

Putative stem cell activity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells during the menstrual cycle

Open access
Schwab, Kjiana Elkje, Chan, Rachel Wah Shan, Gargett, Caroline Eve·2005·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To determine whether menstrual cycle stage or activity has an effect on the clonogenic activity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells.Design Clonal analysis of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells derived from full-thickness endometrium.Setting University research laboratory.Patient(s) Twenty-six women of varying age and race undergoing hysterectomy for nonendometrial pathologies.Intervention(s) Full-thickness human endometrial tissue was dissociated into single cells. Epithelial and stromal cells were separated using magnetic beads, and cloning assays were performed in serum-containing or growth factor-supplemented serum-free medium.Main outcome measure(s) Clonogenic activity of epithelial and stromal cells.Result(s) Clonogenicity of epithelial and stromal cells did not vary significantly between proliferative, secretory, and inactive endometrium. However, epithelial and stromal cells did show a trend for greater numbers of clonogenic cells in secretory and proliferative endometrium respectively. A large variation between samples was observed, which may have masked any significant differences.Conclusion(s) We found that clonogenicity does not vary from the proliferative to secretory stage of the menstrual cycle, or between active, cycling and inactive endometrium for both epithelial and stromal cells. We have demonstrated for the first time that inactive endometrium contains clonogenic epithelial and stromal cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.056

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rare stromal and epithelial cells (1.25 and 0.22%, respectively) with high proliferative capacity were identified, providing the first evidence of endometrial stem cells.

    “Rare stromal and epithelial cells (1.25 and 0.22%, respectively) with high proliferative capacity were identified, providing the first evidence of endometrial stem cells (Chan et al., 2004;Schwab et al., 2005).”

    From Endometriosis and nuclear receptors (2019) · cites this paper as Schwab et al., 2005

    The introductory passage labelled Abstract reports the stated percentages for clonogenic stromal and epithelial cells, but says only the relatively few cells forming large colonies had high proliferative potential; the percentages also include small colonies with low proliferative potential. The Discussion describes these cells as evidence supporting a putative endometrial stem-cell niche, not definitive identification of stem cells. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Fuchs E, Segre JA. Stem cells: a new lease on life. Cell 2000;100:143-55.
  2. Chan RW, Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Clonogenicity of human endome- trial epithelial and stromal cells. Biol Reprod 2004;70:1738 -50.
  3. Padykula HA, Coles LG, Okulicz WC, Rapaport SI, McCracken JA, King NW Jr, et al. The basalis of the primate endometrium: a bifunc- tional germinal compartment. Biol Reprod 1989;40:681-90.
  4. Chegini N, Rossi MJ, Masterson BJ. PDGF, EGF and EGF and PDGF beta-receptors in human endometrial tissue: localisation and in vitro action. Endocrinology 1992;130:2373-85.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwab, K. E., Chan, R. W. S., & Gargett, C. E.
Affiliations
Monash Medical Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Gargett, Caroline Eve
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
84
Pages
1124-1130
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106686929
Cited by
249
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Monash University
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (124331, 284344)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
endometrial stem cells, endometrial epithelial cells, endometrial stromal cells, clonogenic activity, menstrual cycle, proliferative phase, luteal phase, endometrium, clonal analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Clone Cells, Endometrium, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Stem Cells, Stromal Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review