Cited by 361Mesenchymal stem cell researchCancer Cells and MetastasisEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Adult stem cells in the endometrium

Gargett, C. E., Masuda, H.·2010·Molecular Human Reproduction

Abstract

Rare cells with adult stem cell activity were recently discovered in human endometrium. Endometrial stem/progenitor cell candidates include epithelial, mesenchymal and endothelial cells, and all may contribute to the rapid endometrial regeneration following menstruation, rather than a single candidate. Endometrial mesenchymal stem-like cells (eMSC) are prospectively isolated as CD146(+)PDGF-Rβ(+) cells and are found in both basalis and functionalis as perivascular cells. Epithelial progenitor cells are detected in colony forming unit assays but their identity awaits elucidation. They are postulated to reside in the basalis in gland bases. Endometrial stem/progenitor cells may be derived from endogenous stem cells, but emerging evidence suggests a bone marrow contribution. Endometrial endothelial progenitor cells are detected as side population cells, which express several endothelial cell markers and differentiate into endometrial glandular epithelial, stromal and endothelial cells. Investigating endometrial stem cell biology is crucial to understanding normal endometrial physiology and to determine their roles in endometrial proliferative diseases. The nature of endometriosis suggests that initiation of ectopic endometrial lesions involves endometrial stem/progenitor cells, a notion compatible with Sampson's retrograde menstruation theory and supported by the demonstration of eMSC in menstrual blood. Evidence of cancer stem cells (CSC) in endometrial cancer indicates that new avenues for developing therapeutic options targeting CSC may become available. We provide an overview of the accumulating evidence for endometrial stem/progenitor cells and their possible roles in endometrial proliferative disorders, and discuss the unresolved issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molehr/gaq061

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • eMSCs were first isolated from the endometrium as CD146(+)PDGFRB(+) dual positive cells and later by a novel single cell surface marker, sushi domain containing-2 (SUSD2).

    “eMSCs were first isolated from the endometrium as CD146(+)PDGFRB(+) dual positive cells and later by a novel single cell surface marker, sushi domain containing-2 (SUSD2) (Gargett and Masuda, 2010).”

    From Endometriosis and nuclear receptors (2019) · cites this paper as Gargett and Masuda, 2010

    The section ‘Markers identifying mesenchymal/stromal stem cells in human endometrium’ (page unavailable) reports isolation of eMSCs using the dual markers CD146 and PDGF-Rβ. It does not report their later isolation using SUSD2; the single marker it discusses is TNAP, as a possible isolation marker rather than an established method. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Anwar S, Buhring HJ, Gargett CE. A single perivascular marker identifies MSC in human endometrium and menstrual blood. Aust Health Med Res Congress 2008;4:P700.
  2. Eberhard D, Tosh D. Transdifferentiation and metaplasia as a paradigm for understanding development and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65:33 -40.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gargett, C. E., & Masuda, H.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Gargett, C. E.
Venue
Molecular Human Reproduction
Published
2010-07-13
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
818-834
ISSN
  • 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2407
OpenAlex
W2099284074
Cited by
361
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 31
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (545992)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
endometrial stem cells, endometrial regeneration, CD146, perivascular cells, endothelial progenitor cells, side population cells, endometriosis, retrograde menstruation, bone marrow-derived stem cells, menstrual blood
MeSH terms
Animals, Endometrium, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Stem Cells, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Biomarkers, Adult Stem Cells, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review