Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection of effective machine learning algorithm and Bot-IoT attacks traffic identification for internet of things in smart city

Shafiq, Muhammad, Tian, Zhihong, Sun, Yanbin, Du, Xiaojiang, Guizani, Mohsen·2020·Future Generation Computer Systems

Abstract

Abstract Identifying cyber attacks traffic is very important for the Internet of things (IoT) security in smart city. Recently, the research community in the field of IoT Security endeavor hard to build anomaly, intrusion and cyber attacks traffic identification model using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for IoT security analysis. However, the critical and significant problem still not studied in depth that is how to select an effective ML algorithm when there are numbers of ML algorithms for cyber attacks detection system for IoT security. In this paper, we proposed a new framework model and a hybrid algorithm to solve this problem. Firstly BoT-IoT identification dataset is applied and its 44 effective features are selected from a number of features for the machine learning algorithm. Then five effective machine learning algorithm is selected for the identification of malicious and anomaly traffic identification and also select the most widely ML algorithm performance evaluation metrics. To find out which ML algorithm is effective and should be used to select for IoT anomaly and intrusion traffic identification, a bijective soft set approach and its algorithm is applied. Then we applied the proposed algorithm based on bijective soft set approach. Our experimental results show that the proposed model with the algorithm is effective for the selection ML algorithm out of numbers of ML algorithms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2020.02.017

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Auld, 2007, Bayesian neural networks for internet traffic classification, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 18, 223, 10.1109/TNN.2006.883010 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Tiwari, 2017, A bijective soft set theoretic approach for concept selection in design process, J. Eng. Des., 28, 100, 10.1080/09544828.2016.1274718 · doi:10.1080/09544828.2016.1274718
  3. Gong, 2010, The bijective soft set with its operations, Comput. Math. Appl., 60, 2270, 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.08.017 · doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2010.08.017
  4. Maji, 2001, Intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets, J. Fuzzy Math., 9, 677
  5. Khan, 2019, Wi-fi frequency selection concept for effective coverage in collapsed structures, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 97, 409, 10.1016/j.future.2019.02.061 · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.02.061

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Shafiq, M., Tian, Z., Sun, Y., Du, X., & Guizani, M.
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
107
Pages
433-442
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006526650
Cited by
384
References
54
FWCI
31.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • National Key research and Development Plan (2018YFB0803504)
  • Guangdong Province Key Research and Development Plan (2019B010137004)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61871140)
  • Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.