Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites

Lavie, Talia, Tractinsky, Noam·2004·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Alben, 1996, Quality of experience, Interactions, 3, 11, 10.1145/235008.235010 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arnheim, R., 1964/1966. From function to expression. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23, 29–41, reprinted in Arnheim, R., Toward a Psychology of Art, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1966. · doi:10.2307/428136
  3. Arnheim, R., 1988. Visual dynamics. American Scientist (reprinted. In: Swede, G. (Ed.), The Psychology of Art: An Experimental Approach, Vol. 76. Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc, Toronto, 1994, pp. 585–591).
  4. Ashford, F.C., 1969. The Aesthetic of Engineering Design, London Business Books, London, pp. 1–29.
  5. Berlyne, D.E. (Ed.), 1974a. Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Washington Hemisphere Pub, Washington, DC.
  6. Bloch, 1995, Seeking the ideal form, Journal of Marketing, 59, 16, 10.2307/1252116 · doi:10.2307/1252116 · Paper page
  7. Boselie, F., 1992. The golden section has no special aesthetic attractivity! Empirical Studies of the Arts (reprinted, Swede, G. (Ed.), 1994. The psychology of art: An Experimental Approach, Vol. 10(1). Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc., Toronto, pp. 1–18). · doi:10.2190/qb14-nk7b-aryt-w5qt
  8. Butler, 1996, Usability engineering turns 10, Interactions, 3, 59, 10.1145/223500.223513 · DOI
  9. Conway, 2003, A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research, Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147, 10.1177/1094428103251541 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fabrigar, 1999, Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research, Psychological Methods, 4, 272, 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fenner, D.E.W., 1996. Introduction to the Aesthetic Attitude, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, pp. 2–19.
  12. Fogarty, G., Forlizzi, J., Hudson, S.E., 2001. Aesthetic information collages: generating decorative displays that contain information. Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, November 2001. · DOI
  13. Gait, 1985, An aspect of aesthetics in human–computer communications, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Se-11, 714, 10.1109/TSE.1985.232520 · doi:10.1109/tse.1985.232520
  14. Getzels, 1969, Aesthetic opinion, Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 34, 10.1086/267665 · doi:10.1086/267665
  15. Green, W.S., Jordan, P.W., (Eds.), 2002. Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability. Taylor and Francis, London. · DOI
  16. van der Heijden, 2003, Factors influencing the usage of websites, Information and Management, 40, 541, 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00079-4 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hekkert, 1996, Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders, American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389, 10.2307/1423013 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hussain, F., 1968. An Experimental Enquiry into the Phenomena of ‘Aesthetic Judgments’ Under Varying Time Conditions, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.
  19. Jacobsen, 2001, Aesthetics electrified, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 177, 10.2190/P7W1-5F1F-NJK9-X05B · doi:10.2190/p7w1-5f1f-njk9-x05b
  20. Jennings, M., 2000. Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive e-commerce websites. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research April 2000. · DOI
  21. Jordan, 1998, Human factors for pleasure in product use, Applied Ergonomics, 29, 25, 10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00022-7 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Karvonen, K., 2000. The beauty of simplicity. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU 2000), November 16–17, 2000, Washington DC, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kotler, 1984, Design a powerful but neglected strategic tool, Journal of Business Strategy, 5, 16, 10.1108/eb039054 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kurosu, M., Kashimura, K., 1995. Apparent usability vs. inherent usability. CHI ’95 Conference Companion, 292–293. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C., 2002. User satisfaction, aesthetics and usability: beyond reductionism. Proceedings International Federation of Information Processing, (IFIP2002), Montreal, 25–30 August. · DOI
  26. Liu, 2000, Exploring the factors associated with site success in the context of electronic commerce, Information and Management, 38, 23, 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00049-5 · DOI · Paper page
  27. MacCallum, 2000, Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research, Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201, 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201 · DOI · Paper page
  28. MacCallum, 1992, Model modifications in covariance structure analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490, 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Martindale, 1990, Aesthetic preference, American Journal of Psychology, 103, 53, 10.2307/1423259 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Mathwick, 2001, Experimental value, Journal of Retailing, 77, 39, 10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00045-2 · DOI · Paper page
  31. McIntosh, 2001, Report on the construct validity of the temporal satisfaction with life scale, Social Indicators Research, 54, 37, 10.1023/A:1007264829700 · DOI
  32. Nasar, 1984, Visual preferences in urban street scenes, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 79, 10.1177/0022002184015001005 · DOI
  33. Neale, W., McCombe, C., 1997. Designing usable and visually appealing web sites. CHI 97 Electronic Publications: Tutorials. · doi:10.1145/1120212.1120327
  34. Norman, D.A., 2002. Emotion and design: attractive things work better. Interactions, July Aug, 36–42. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Oostendorp, 1978, Dimensions in the perception of architecture, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 19, 73, 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1978.tb00305.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1978.tb00305.x
  36. Schenkman, 2000, Aesthetics and preferences of web pages, Behavior and Information Technology, 19, 367, 10.1080/014492900750000063 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Scheirer, 2002, Frustrating the user on purpose, Interacting with Computers, 14, 93, 10.1016/S0953-5438(01)00059-5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Tractinsky, N., 1997. Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. ACM CHI Conference Proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 115–122. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Watson, 1998, Measuring information systems service quality, MIS Quarterly, 22, 61, 10.2307/249678 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Webster, 1992, Microcomputer playfulness, MIS Quarterly, 16, 201, 10.2307/249576 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Webster, 1993, The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions, Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 411, 10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N · DOI · Paper page
  42. Whitney, 1988, Manufacturing by design, Harvard Business Review, 66, 83
  43. Yamamoto, 1994, The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 309, 10.1016/0737-6782(94)90086-8 · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(94)90086-8

Cited by

See all 1,335

Metadata

Authors
Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N.
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
269-298
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
OpenAlex
W1971604583
Cited by
1,335
References
9
FWCI
28.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
The paper
Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.