Cited by 91Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Psychosocial interventions on psychological outcomes of parents with perinatal loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shaohua, Liu, Shorey, Shefaly·2021·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Perinatal loss can occur due to miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies, among other circumstances. Psychological health of parents can deteriorate due to perinatal loss. Parent's negative psychological outcomes include depression, anxiety, and grief.Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in reducing depression, anxiety, and grief among parents after perinatal loss.Design A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials DATA SOURCES: English language articles published from database inception to 19 November 2019 were systematically retrieved from eight electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science).Review methods The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to conduct quality appraisal of each individual article and data was analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted using a random-effect model.Results Among this review's 17 included studies, 15 studies' results were included in the meta-analyses. The remaining two studies were summarized narratively. Meta-analyses revealed that psychosocial interventions significantly reduced depression (95% CI: -0.64 to -0.29, Z = 5.17, p = <0.00001), anxiety (95% CI: -0.50 to -0.18, Z = 4.21, p < 0.0001) and grief (95% CI: -0.71 to -0.32, Z = 5.12, p < 0.0001).Conclusion Psychosocial interventions are effective in improving depression, anxiety, and grief amongst parents with perinatal loss. Psychosocial care can be provided by medical healthcare professionals and expanded with technology-assisted implementation.Study registration number CRD42019145526.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103871

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaohua, L., & Shorey, S.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Shorey, Shefaly
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
117
Pages
103871
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120445834
Cited by
91
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
perinatal loss, psychosocial interventions, parental depression, parental anxiety, grief, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Intervention, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Parents, Pregnancy, Parturition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review