Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 567

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior

Open access
Arts, Joep W.C., Frambach, Ruud T., Bijmolt, Tammo H.A.·2011·International Journal of Research in Marketing
DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Alexander, 2008, As time goes by: Do cold feet follow warm intentions for really new versus incrementally new products?, Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 307, 10.1509/jmkr.45.3.307 · DOI
  2. Assmus, 1984, How advertising affects sales — Meta-analysis of econometric results, Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 65, 10.2307/3151793 · DOI
  3. Bemmaor, 1995, Predicting behavior from intention-to-buy measures — The parametric case, Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 176, 10.2307/3152046 · DOI
  4. Berger, 2008, Dogs on the street, pumas on your feet: How cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 1, 10.1509/jmkr.45.1.1 · DOI
  5. Bijmolt, 2001, Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements, Marketing Letters, 12, 157, 10.1023/A:1011117103381 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Castaño, 2008, Managing consumer uncertainty in the adoption of new products: Temporal distance and mental simulation, Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 320, 10.1509/jmkr.45.3.320 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Darden, 1974, Backward profiling of male innovators, Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 79, 10.2307/3150996 · DOI
  8. Demoulin, 2009, Drivers of consumers' adoption and adoption timing of a new loyalty card in the grocery retail market, Journal of Retailing, 85, 391, 10.1016/j.jretai.2009.05.007 · DOI
  9. Gatignon, 1985, A propositional inventory for new diffusion research, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 849, 10.1086/209021 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Geyskens, 1998, Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 223, 10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00002-0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Goldenberg, 2009, The role of hubs in the adoption process, Journal of Marketing, 73, 1, 10.1509/jmkg.73.2.1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gutman, 1982, A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes, Journal of Marketing, 46, 66, 10.2307/3203341 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hauser, 2006, Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science, Marketing Science, 25, 687, 10.1287/mksc.1050.0144 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Henard, 2001, Why some new products are more successful than others, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 362, 10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Herzenstein, 2007, Adoption of new and really new products: The effects of self-regulation systems and risk salience, Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 251, 10.1509/jmkr.44.2.251 · DOI
  16. Hirschman, 1980, Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity, Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 283, 10.1086/208816 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hoeffler, 2003, Measuring preferences for really new products, Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 406, 10.1509/jmkr.40.4.406.19394 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Holak, 1990, Purchase intentions and the dimensions of innovation: An exploratory model, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7, 59, 10.1016/0737-6782(90)90032-A · DOI
  19. Im, 2003, An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 61, 10.1177/0092070302238602 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Infosino, 1986, Forecasting new product sales from likelihood of purchase ratings, Marketing Science, 5, 372, 10.1287/mksc.5.4.372 · DOI
  21. Jamieson, 1989, Adjusting stated intention measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparison of models and methods, Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 336, 10.2307/3172905 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Karahanna, 1999, Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs, MIS Quarterly, 23, 183, 10.2307/249751 · DOI
  23. Lambert-Pandraud, 2010, “Why do older consumers buy older brands? The role of attachment and declining innovativeness”, Journal of Marketing, 74, 104, 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.104 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lynch, 2006, When do you want it? Time, decisions, and public policy, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25, 67, 10.1509/jppm.25.1.67 · DOI
  25. Messinger, 1998, Pleasure and complexity: Berlyne revisited, The Journal of Psychology, 132, 558, 10.1080/00223989809599288 · DOI
  26. Meuter, 2005, Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies, Journal of Marketing, 69, 61, 10.1509/jmkg.69.2.61.60759 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Mittal, 1999, Attribute-level performance, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions over time: A consumption–system approach, Journal of Marketing, 63, 88, 10.2307/1251947 · DOI
  28. Moreau, 2001, Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 14, 10.1509/jmkr.38.1.14.18836 · DOI
  29. Morrison, 1979, Purchase intentions and purchase behavior, Journal of Marketing, 43, 65, 10.2307/1250742 · DOI
  30. Morwitz, 2007, When do purchase intentions predict sales?, International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 347, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Ostlund, 1974, Perceived innovation attributes as predictors of innovativeness, Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 23, 10.1086/208587 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Prochaska, 1994, Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors", Health Psychology, 13, 39, 10.1037/0278-6133.13.1.39 · DOI
  33. Raju, 1980, Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 272, 10.1086/208815 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rook, 1987, The buying impulse, Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 189, 10.1086/209105 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Schnaars, 2004, On the presence of lackluster demand — The history of the video telephone, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71, 197, 10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00410-9 · DOI
  36. Sheppard, 1988, The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325, 10.1086/209170 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sriram, 2010, Investigating consumer purchase behavior in related technology product categories, Marketing Science, 29, 291, 10.1287/mksc.1090.0506 · DOI
  38. Steenkamp, 2003, Consumer and market drivers of the trial probability of new consumer packaged goods, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 368, 10.1086/378615 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Summers, 1971, Generalized change agents and innovativeness, Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 313, 10.2307/3149568 · DOI
  40. Sun, 2010, Stated intentions and purchase behavior: A unified model, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 356, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.06.001 · DOI
  41. Taylor, 1995, Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 137, 10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K · DOI · Paper page
  42. Thompson, 2005, Feature fatigue: When product capabilities become too much of a good thing, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 431, 10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.431 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Tornatzky, 1982, Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption–implementation: A meta-analysis of findings, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29, 28, 10.1109/TEM.1982.6447463 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Trope, 2003, Temporal construal, Psychological Review, 110, 403, 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Van Ittersum, 2010, Cumulative timed intent: A new predictive tool for technology adoption, Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 808, 10.1509/jmkr.47.5.808 · DOI
  46. Vandecasteele, 2010, Motivated consumer innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 308, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Wilton, 1981, Forecasting the ultimate acceptance of an innovation: The effects of information, Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 162, 10.1086/208852 · DOI
  48. Wood, 2002, Prior knowledge and complacency in new product learning, Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 416, 10.1086/344425 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wood, 2006, From fear to loathing? How emotion influences the evaluation and early use of innovations, Journal of Marketing, 70, 44, 10.1509/jmkg.70.3.44 · DOI
  50. Young, 1998, The stochastic modeling of purchase intentions and behavior, Management Science, 44, 188, 10.1287/mnsc.44.2.188 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arts, J. W. C., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. A.
Venue
International Journal of Research in Marketing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
134-144
ISSN
0167-8116 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002
OpenAlex
W2102803219
Cited by
567
References
9
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.