The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- John Quiggin, 2006. When co-operation trumps competition, The Australian Financial Review, Review section, 16 June 2006, p. 8.
Cited by
Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization
Zuboff, S. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5 · Cited by 3,205
“5 These subjectivities of self-determination found expression in a new networked individual sphere characterized by what Benkler (2006) aptly summarized as non-market forms of ‘ social production.”
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 · Cited by 2,469
Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002 · Cited by 1,655
The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818769694 · Cited by 1,530
Putting the sharing economy into perspective
Frenken, K., & Schor, J. (2017) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003 · Cited by 1,105
Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research
Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12349 · Cited by 789
Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation
Shneiderman, B. (2007) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1323688.1323689 · Cited by 765
Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817724170 · Cited by 738
Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization
Bozdag, E. (2013) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6 · Cited by 649
The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0382 · Cited by 573
Ratkiewicz (2011) · doi:10.1145/1963192.1963301 · Cited by 541
Growing on Steroids: Rapidly Scaling the User Base of Digital Ventures Through Digital Innovaton1
Huang, J., Henfridsson, O., Liu, M. J., & Newell, S. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.16 · Cited by 478
Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies
Ashok, M., Madan, R., Joha, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433 · Cited by 469
Social media and the formation of organizational reputation
Etter, M., Ravasi, D., & Colleoni, E. (2019) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0280 · Cited by 428
After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State
Lynch, M. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592711000910 · Cited by 388
The Consequences of the Internet for Politics
Farrell, H. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815 · Cited by 387
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373
The invisible politics of Bitcoin: governance crisis of a decentralised infrastructure
De Filippi, P., & Loveluck, B. (2016) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2016.3.427 · Cited by 298
Eady, G., Nagler, J., Guess, A., Zilinsky, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2019) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019832705 · Cited by 281
Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy
Cockayne, D. G. (2016) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.005 · Cited by 277
Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance
Levine, S. S., & Prietula, M. J. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0872 · Cited by 263
Social networks, mobile lives and social inequalities
Urry, J. (2012) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.003 · Cited by 224
Zhang, Y., Wells, C., Wang, S., & Rohe, K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817744390 · Cited by 155
Patient data as medical facts: social media practices as a foundation for medical knowledge creation
Kallinikos, J., & Tempini, N. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2014.0544 · Cited by 141
New media, old criticism: Bloggers’ press criticism and the journalistic field
Vos, T. P., Craft, S., & Ashley, S. (2012) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884911421705 · Cited by 131
Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled
Kelty, C., Panofsky, A., Currie, M., Crooks, R., Erickson, S., Garcia, P., Wartenbe, M., & Wood, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23202 · Cited by 124
Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source software project
Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Gaskin, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0673 · Cited by 121
Alliance of antagonism: Counterpublics and polarization in online climate change communication
Kaiser, J., & Puschmann, C. (2017) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/2057047317732350 · Cited by 75
Product-Service System Design for Sustainability
Vezzoli, C., Kohtala, C., Srinivasan, A., Diehl, J., Fusakul, S. M., Xin, L., & Sateesh, D. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781351278003 · Cited by 66
Earl, J. (2018) · The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements · doi:10.1002/9781119168577.ch16 · Cited by 68
The Economy of the Digital Gift: From Socialism to Sociality Online
Romele, A., & Severo, M. (2016) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276415619474 · Cited by 42
Jensen, K. B. (2016) · The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy · doi:10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect170 · Cited by 44
How sharing is the “sharing economy”? Evidence from 97 Airbnb markets
Törnberg, P. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266998 · Cited by 24
The Problem of Privacy in Capitalism and the Alternative Social Networking Site Diaspora*
Sevignani, S. (2012) · tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/triplec.v10i2.394 · Cited by 22
Air/time Travel: Rethinking Appropriation in Global HCI and Futures of Electronic Exchange
Mwesigwa, D., & Csíkszentmihályi, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642590 · Cited by 20
Rozas, D., & Huckle, S. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24393 · Cited by 17
The (in)visible barriers to free software: Inequalities in online communities in Spain
Calvo, D. (2021) · Studies in Communication Sciences · doi:10.24434/j.scoms.2021.01.011 · Cited by 12
Trust and power in Airbnb's digital rating and reputation system
Christiaens, T. (2025) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-025-09825-6 · Cited by 11
“It renders the political arena more accessible to voices otherwise marginalized (Benkler, 2006; Schneider, 2022), but it also boosts the influence of inflammatory and polarizing opinions (Davies, 2021; Gerbaudo, 2018; Sunstein, 2018).”
Hvenegaard Rasmussen, C., Rydbeck, K., & Larsen, H. (2022) · doi:10.4324/9781003188834 · Cited by 8
Cautious hope: prospects and perils of communitarian governance in a Web3 environment
Ettlinger, N. (2024) · Digital Geography and Society · doi:10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100080 · Cited by 5
Commons-Governed Artificial Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Collective Governance
Garrido-Merchán, E. C. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15466
“…when the work is modular, its components are of fine and heterogeneous granularity, and the cost of integrating contributions is low; free and open-source software is the canonical case, and the argument is developed into a general account of the networked information economy in Benkler (2006).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Given, J.
- Venue
- Information Economics and Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-282
- ISSN
- 0167-6245 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019923146
- Cited by
- 1,387
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
