The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption
Abstract
Social network services (SNS) focus on building online communities of people who share interests and/or activities, or who are interested in exploring the interests and activities of others. This study examines security, trust, and privacy concerns with regard to social networking Websites among consumers using both reliable scales and measures. It proposes an SNS acceptance model by integrating cognitive as well as affective attitudes as primary influencing factors, which are driven by underlying beliefs, perceived security, perceived privacy, trust, attitude, and intention. Results from a survey of SNS users validate that the proposed theoretical model explains and predicts user acceptance of SNS substantially well. The model shows excellent measurement properties and establishes perceived privacy and perceived security of SNS as distinct constructs. The finding also reveals that perceived security moderates the effect of perceived privacy on trust. Based on the results of this study, practical implications for marketing strategies in SNS markets and theoretical implications are recommended accordingly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Consumer trust in an Internet store
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1023/a:1019104520776 · Cited by 2,577
Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0015 · Cited by 2,516
Cited by
A study of the impact of social media on consumers
Hajli, M. N. (2014) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.2501/ijmr-2014-025 · Cited by 854
Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy
Hajli, N. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005 · Cited by 826
Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance
Shin, D., & Park, Y. J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019 · Cited by 643
Self-citationLien, C. H., & Cao, Y. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.013 · Cited by 513
Banking “on-the-go”: examining consumers’ adoption of mobile banking services
Zhang, T., Lu, C., & Kizildag, M. (2018) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/ijqss-07-2017-0067 · Cited by 239
Albayati, H. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203 · Cited by 188
Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification
Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z · Cited by 181
Beyond user experience: What constitutes algorithmic experiences?
Shin, D., Zhong, B., & Biocca, F. A. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102061 · Cited by 174
Self-citationWhat makes consumers trust and adopt FinTech? An empirical investigation in China
Roh, T., Yang, Y. S., Xiao, S., & Park, B. I. (2024) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-021-09527-3 · Cited by 164
Who to trust? Applying trust to social commerce.
Sharma, S., Menard, P., & Mutchler, L. A. (2019) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2017.1289356 · Cited by 156
Living a private life in public social networks: An exploration of member self-disclosure
Chen, R. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.003 · Cited by 124
Terblanche, N., & Kidd, M. (2022) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221096136 · Cited by 120
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Fitili, A. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.036 · Cited by 119
The impact of positive valence and negative valence on social commerce purchase intention
Hajli, N. (2019) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-02-2018-0099 · Cited by 112
Wang, T., Jung, C.-H., Kang, M.-H., & Chung, Y.-S. (2014) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.781221 · Cited by 95
Saving face on Facebook: Privacy concerns, social benefits, and impression management
Proudfoot, J. G., Wilson, D., Valacich, J. S., & Byrd, M. D. (2018) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2017.1389988 · Cited by 75
Impact of privacy, trust and user activity on intentions to share Facebook photos
Malik, A., Hiekkanen, K., Dhir, A., & Nieminen, M. (2016) · Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-06-2015-0022 · Cited by 72
Risk-taking as a Learning Process for Shaping Teen's Online Information Privacy Behaviors
Jia, H., Wisniewski, P. J., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675287 · Cited by 70
Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2014) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.06.009 · Cited by 55
Building customer equity through trust in social networking sites: A perspective from Thai consumers
Kananukul, C., Jung, S., & Watchravesringkan, K. (2015) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-03-2014-0019 · Cited by 42
Financial technology adoption among small and medium enterprises in Ghana
Krah, R., Tetteh, L. A., Boateng, A., & Amankwa, R. F. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2321786 · Cited by 36
“…use has been identified as a significant predictor of an individual’s cognitive preparedness to engage in a specific behaviour (Kosasi et al., 2019; shin, 2010). in a more precise sense, intention to use refers to the feeling to implement a systematic approach to work, employ efficient methods for…”
Gender differences in the antecedents of trust in mobile social networking services
Gong, X., Liu, Z., & Wu, T. (2021) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2018.1497162 · Cited by 18
Using Social Networking Sites: A Qualitative Cross-Cultural Comparison
Kalia, P., Ben Dahmane Mouelhi, N., Tebessi Hachana, S., Malek, F., & Dahmen, M. (2019) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8300-7_23 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Shin, D.-H.
- Venue
- Interacting with Computers
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 428-438
- ISSN
- 0953-5438 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031889621
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 62.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.