Cited by 36Sleep and related disordersDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Digitally-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy for youth insomnia: A systematic review

Open access
Werner-Seidler, Aliza, Johnston, Lara, Christensen, Helen·2018·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Sleep disturbance is common among young people, with consequences for academic, emotional and behavioural development. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is efficacious, yet it is costly and not available to many who need it. Digitally-delivered CBT-I (eCBT-I) has the potential to overcome these barriers. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify studies which report on the efficacy or effectiveness of eCBT-I for young people with sleep disturbance. Electronic databases were systematically searched and three studies met inclusion criteria. Two studies used the same online intervention for adolescents with insomnia symptoms, while the other was conducted in a college sample of individuals who opted into a stress-management study. Results showed that eCBT-I improved sleep efficiency, sleep quality, sleep-onset latency and total sleep time with effect sizes ranging from 0.17–1.30 (Cohen's d). This suggests that eCBT-I is a promising intervention for young people, but more studies are needed to verify the conditions under which it is most effective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2018.01.007

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently, there are no digital CBT-I programmes that are commercially available for youth.

    “Currently, there are no digital CBT-I programmes that are commercially available for youth.21”

    From Pilot evaluation of the Sleep Ninja: A smartphone application for adolescent insomnia symptoms (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results (Studies meeting inclusion criteria; page unavailable) describe a commercially available online CBT-I program, “Insomnia Relief,” tested in university students. Because the review includes that student sample among its studies of young people, it contradicts the claim that no such program is commercially available for youth. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This is the first study that the authors are aware of that has evaluated app-delivered CBT-I in young people, and only the second study that has tested mobile phone delivery of CBT-I, the first study being conducted in adults with positive effects on sleep outcomes.

    “This is the first study that we are aware of that has evaluated app-delivered CBT-I in young people,21 and only the second study that has tested mobile phone delivery of CBT-I, the first study being conducted in adults, with positive effects on sleep outcomes.48”

    From Pilot evaluation of the Sleep Ninja: A smartphone application for adolescent insomnia symptoms (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werner-Seidler, A., Johnston, L., & Christensen, H.
Affiliations
Black Dog Institute (AU)
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
11
Pages
71-78
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791909052
Cited by
36
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1056964)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, digital mental health interventions, sleep disorders, adolescents, university students, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, sleep quality, stress management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review